|
Tube DIY Asylum Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders. |
|
|
|
Tube DIY Asylum Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders. |
|
In Reply to: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. posted by Sector-7G on November 30, 2004 at 19:35:57:
well... either a whole bunch of folks like Norman Crowhurst, Frederick Termin, RCA engineers, Steve Bench, RDH contributors, John Broskie, etc, et al... all got this wrong...Or you need to go back to and have an honest fresh look at their material and try to understand and master the methods which they have outlined and demonstrated.
I can't and won't do it for you.
I put up the information (and offered no opinions of my own) as references for people to explore and evaluate the articles on their own given the incessant harping and baiting that has accompanied the exploration of this technical issue by primarily one other person.
And I have no interest in arguing or debating these issues with you or anyone else... the sources speak for themselves and the trueness or falseness of their respective thesis is strictly independent of whether I am able to or care to defend (or oppose) the several theses that they have offered. I have adopted this position since this technical debate has been transformed by some into a lithmus test and\or a religious crusade and has been used as a battle axe.
However, I did find it interesting (notice... I did not say I agree or disagree) that the RCA engineers state explicitly that each triode in a pure class A PP amp sees one quarter of raa as it's reflected load impedance... and I stumbled across this when I was just killing some time waiting to pick up my girls from school and was reading the front of the RCA manual which I referenced.Now... if they are wrong and *IF* I did agree with them or have a tendency to agree with their stated views... then, none-the-less, that would not be in keeping with bad company would it?
So... why the near religious dimension to this debate?
MSL
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - mqracing 20:38:53 11/30/04 (24)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Sector-7G 05:19:02 12/01/04 (1)
- Wow... - Damir_the real one 05:36:00 12/01/04 (0)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Sector-7G 04:37:21 12/01/04 (19)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - mqracing 07:08:56 12/01/04 (18)
- this is where you have gone wrong... - Sector-7G 05:06:34 12/04/04 (0)
- keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Sector-7G 07:50:10 12/01/04 (16)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - mqracing 08:50:24 12/01/04 (15)
- References... - Damir _ the real one 10:51:27 12/01/04 (1)
- Here is an old published example - Russ57 10:03:15 12/01/04 (5)
- Re: Here is an old published example - mqracing 12:36:02 12/01/04 (4)
- Re: Here is an old published example - Dave Cigna 14:12:10 12/02/04 (1)
- or... - Sector-7G 14:58:52 12/02/04 (0)
- Well, you did ask for a published reference:) - Russ57 10:23:13 12/02/04 (0)
- well, I'll just add him to the list... - Sector-7G 12:47:45 12/01/04 (0)
- since you want it out in the open... - Sector-7G 09:33:05 12/01/04 (0)
- maybe you won't get it.... - Sector-7G 09:21:25 12/01/04 (6)
- or, if you find Crowhurst too confusing or complex.... - mqracing 10:54:03 12/01/04 (3)
- you can't even compute a load line value from its slope... - Sector-7G 11:00:41 12/01/04 (2)
- go for it Dougie.... - mqracing 12:21:41 12/01/04 (1)
- thank you Mike... - Sector-7G 06:17:03 12/02/04 (0)
- keep reading dougie.... - mqracing 10:52:00 12/01/04 (1)
- why? - Sector-7G 09:11:51 12/02/04 (0)
- Re: keep going...sooner or later, you'll get it. - Damir_the real one 23:08:35 11/30/04 (1)
- Now this I like a lot.....great explanation...thanks(nt) - Russ57 07:22:38 12/01/04 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
