In Reply to: Re: A comparison of two 6sn7 circuits. posted by GEO on September 5, 2004 at 16:15:20:
>>>You are using the term incorrrectly (BTW).<<<
No surprise there>>>I put this kernal of knowlege in the same bucket as the Direct Coupled versus Cap Coupled argument and the no preamp versus the active preamp versus the passive preamp argument.<<<
Yea, I kind of stopped paying attention after a while.>>>As for isolating the variables, your only valid conclusion based on your findings is that when employing the 6SN7, it is better in the Fi Primer variant than in the SRPP.
True, and only better in his terms. He isn't very good at that sort of thing...>>>Also, from what I know about 6SN7s, the sound of that tube depending on make, mfg and year, who knows if the same preferential topology would endure across all the various 6SN7s.<<<
Absolutely true.I canj see some 6SN7s sounding better in one topology, but others sounding better in the other. OTOH, many tube types have this problem.
Jack
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Hey GEO - Jack G 11:48:55 09/06/04 (3)
- Generalizations - paul_s 13:26:10 09/06/04 (0)
- Re: Hey GEO - GEO 12:13:49 09/06/04 (1)
- Re: Hey GEO - njjohn 17:45:48 09/06/04 (0)