Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

Three posts to reply?

I am sure that you felt the need to respond three times, just to make sure your spin was seen enough. Getting desperate, aren't we?

As for one of the few relevant issues you kinda sorta address, my original statement was:
" (This was all over at AR) "

You shortened it to:
"all over AR"

Of course the WRONG WORDS seem much more like you want to spin it, but now it becomes clear that you are doing exactly what I said you do:
"placing words in my mouth, saying that I did or said things that I did not, misconstruing my posts, taking things out of context, misrepresenting what I have posted"

Finally, you still have not provided any evidence for your claims that skin effect does not cause time smear. Nothing.
Refering to mentioning a whole book in some obscure post ages ago, is NOT a reference or citation that is specific to the subject matter at hand, and can hardly be considered relevant or worthy as backup for what you claimed. The mention of the Hawksford paper is a red herring, and has nothing to do with failing to backup your specific claim.
This clearly shows your hypocrisy.

Now, why don't you post three more bogus replies in desperation.


Jon Risch


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.