In Reply to: ahhh, some more time to kill..where was I? posted by jneutron on November 2, 2004 at 10:06:16:
I am sure that you felt the need to respond three times, just to make sure your spin was seen enough. Getting desperate, aren't we?As for one of the few relevant issues you kinda sorta address, my original statement was:
" (This was all over at AR) "You shortened it to:
"all over AR"Of course the WRONG WORDS seem much more like you want to spin it, but now it becomes clear that you are doing exactly what I said you do:
"placing words in my mouth, saying that I did or said things that I did not, misconstruing my posts, taking things out of context, misrepresenting what I have posted"Finally, you still have not provided any evidence for your claims that skin effect does not cause time smear. Nothing.
Refering to mentioning a whole book in some obscure post ages ago, is NOT a reference or citation that is specific to the subject matter at hand, and can hardly be considered relevant or worthy as backup for what you claimed. The mention of the Hawksford paper is a red herring, and has nothing to do with failing to backup your specific claim.
This clearly shows your hypocrisy.Now, why don't you post three more bogus replies in desperation.
Jon Risch
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Three posts to reply? - Jon Risch 18:30:54 11/02/04 (21)
- Re: Three posts to reply? - john curl 09:20:45 11/03/04 (1)
- hmmm.. - jneutron 09:44:48 11/03/04 (0)
- Hmmm..aren't you the one to post SEVEN consecutive - jneutron 06:01:28 11/03/04 (18)
- aha.. - jneutron 08:53:06 11/03/04 (17)
- Re: aha.. - Jon Risch 19:54:20 11/03/04 (16)
- Re: aha.. - jneutron 07:03:03 11/04/04 (15)
- figures...talk about the equations, and poof...gone - jneutron 06:52:17 11/05/04 (14)
- Still (nt) - Jon Risch 10:04:31 11/06/04 (2)
- Re: Still (nt) - john curl 11:56:58 11/06/04 (1)
- Ask a question...poof, an answer. - jneutron 07:48:00 11/08/04 (0)
- Re: figures...talk about the equations, and poof...gone - john curl 10:04:33 11/05/04 (10)
- Re: figures...talk about the equations, and poof...gone - jneutron 12:21:50 11/05/04 (9)
- Spin, spin, spin - Jon Risch 19:44:38 11/07/04 (3)
- Why didn't you address the theory, Jon??? - jneutron 07:15:58 11/08/04 (2)
- Still dodging providing YOUR evidence for YOUR claim! - Jon Risch 10:36:44 11/08/04 (1)
- um, Jon?? answer the question Jon...the proof is in the answer. - jneutron 11:20:05 11/08/04 (0)
- here's the lidar info. - jneutron 12:55:22 11/05/04 (4)
- Re: here's the lidar info. - john curl 16:14:53 11/05/04 (3)
- Re: here's the lidar info. - jneutron 06:41:56 11/08/04 (2)
- Re: here's the lidar info. - john curl 10:07:25 11/08/04 (1)
- Re: here's the lidar info. - jneutron 10:28:27 11/08/04 (0)