Oh, btw, I responded to your other "intellectual" diatribe in general..here it is case ya missed it.

Posted by jneutron (A) on November 1, 2004 at 13:48:35

In Reply to: your usual intellectual retort....arggghhh...I'm hit!!nt. posted by jneutron on November 1, 2004 at 12:47:36:

John Curl..""Spoke to Dr. Hawksford yesterday. He doesn't think much of you, either""

And that somehow, means something to me????
I still await his publishing in AES, the claptrap he put into a magazine. I would pay good money to watch his peers trash his presentation and his thought processes, in developing such balderdash..ALAS, that will never happen..

When I make a statement that is incorrect, I at least have the BALLS to admit such..

You do not. So you do not impress me.

Hawksford does not. He also does not impress me.
When you somehow regain the intellectual strength of character to admit the limitations of your understanding, I will then have a somewhat less than sub-par impression of you.

Hawksford has at least moved on, not ever mentioning his '85 article....you would be wise to follow his lead in that respect.

I, at least, have resisted all efforts by others to convince me to publish my results on his article. Three times, three different ways, no reproducibility of his results...Until I swap steel conductor in place of copper...then, the internal inductance shows up. I do not believe writing and presenting a paper who's sole reason for existence is to trash someone else, is justification for that paper. I am confident that you, on the other hand, would relish the opportunity to do so...I do not share your lack of morals in that regard.

As it is, it is taking far too much effort bringing reality back to e/m theory for the masses. Such is the problem of an article of that "level" being believed by so many...it takes a long time to debunk the incorrect stuff when everyone is clamoring to believe..

This is such a huge difference from the international high energy physics community I work within....when someone publishes, they do so for concurrence, for criticism, for collaborative reasons...If what is published is wrong, the author embraces peer review...that is how science progresses...

YOU are unable to do so...that is why you are stuck in your hole, changing parts at random, playing a bit, to make your product designs better....you are not engineering better product, you are using a shotgun approach...but that helps nobody, John...

I defined a 75 ohm backwards compatible RCA....what have you done.

I defined skin theory as applied to swiss roll electrolytics, and how to test for it....what have you done?

I defined how to test the same effect on ribbon inductors and ribbon transmission lines...what have you done?

I defined loop coupling, along with three test setups to look for such, setting up the methodology for determining how a line cord can indeed affect the sound of a system....what have you done?

I defined equations for coaxial construct limitations, how to make any impedance coax with any dielectric...what have you done?

John...it's time to get off the bowl...wipe, for god's sake..

Cheers, John

PS...as for what I think of Hawksford??? I have stated here, other forums, in e-mails to you...I consider him to be a genius w/r to DSP. I believe the word I used was "monster". And I stated publicly that it would take me years to get enough of an understanding of the subject to be able to read some of his papers..

So, what exactly are you talking about, John??? You are also one of the biggest hindrances to the understanding of high end audio. Change your attitude, and you will not.

I finish this post, knowing full well that you will reply with your typical Oh yah!!, jneutron you are full of it!!! type of post.. (don't dissapoint me, John..)

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - A comment about Steve Eddy and Cables & a reply by Steve? - Jon Risch 21:36:22 10/31/04 (46)

*sigh* - Steve Eddy 23:21:59 11/01/04 (7)

Re: *sigh* - Jon Risch 18:32:54 11/02/04 (0)

Re: *sigh* - jneutron 05:57:12 11/02/04 (5)

Re: *sigh* - Phil Tower 17:22:07 11/09/04 (4)

Re: *sigh* - Jon Risch 19:35:27 11/10/04 (0)

Re: *sigh* - john curl 09:36:07 11/10/04 (1)

Re: *sigh* - Phil Tower 11:33:52 11/11/04 (0)

Hi Phil, long time no hear. - jneutron 06:43:11 11/10/04 (0)

Re: A comment about Steve Eddy and Cables & a reply by Steve? - Steve Eddy 22:44:28 10/31/04 (37)

Re: A comment about Steve Eddy and Cables & a reply by Steve? - jneutron 12:01:32 11/01/04 (36)

Re: A comment about Steve Eddy and Cables & a reply by Steve? - Jon Risch 20:43:14 11/01/04 (32)

Re: A comment about Steve Eddy and Cables & a reply by Steve? - john curl 14:58:47 11/02/04 (3)

Hi John - jneutron 06:27:56 11/03/04 (2)

Re: Hi John - john curl 09:11:57 11/03/04 (1)

Re: Hi John - jneutron 09:37:53 11/03/04 (0)

here we go...closeout..man, you run on, don't ya? dere's da finish line - jneutron 14:00:32 11/02/04 (0)

ahhh, some more time to kill..where was I? - jneutron 10:06:16 11/02/04 (24)

Three posts to reply? - Jon Risch 18:30:54 11/02/04 (21)

Re: Three posts to reply? - john curl 09:20:45 11/03/04 (1)

hmmm.. - jneutron 09:44:48 11/03/04 (0)

Hmmm..aren't you the one to post SEVEN consecutive - jneutron 06:01:28 11/03/04 (18)

aha.. - jneutron 08:53:06 11/03/04 (17)

Re: aha.. - Jon Risch 19:54:20 11/03/04 (16)

Re: aha.. - jneutron 07:03:03 11/04/04 (15)

figures...talk about the equations, and poof...gone - jneutron 06:52:17 11/05/04 (14)

Still (nt) - Jon Risch 10:04:31 11/06/04 (2)

Re: Still (nt) - john curl 11:56:58 11/06/04 (1)

Ask a question...poof, an answer. - jneutron 07:48:00 11/08/04 (0)

Re: figures...talk about the equations, and poof...gone - john curl 10:04:33 11/05/04 (10)

Re: figures...talk about the equations, and poof...gone - jneutron 12:21:50 11/05/04 (9)

Spin, spin, spin - Jon Risch 19:44:38 11/07/04 (3)

Why didn't you address the theory, Jon??? - jneutron 07:15:58 11/08/04 (2)

Still dodging providing YOUR evidence for YOUR claim! - Jon Risch 10:36:44 11/08/04 (1)

um, Jon?? answer the question Jon...the proof is in the answer. - jneutron 11:20:05 11/08/04 (0)

here's the lidar info. - jneutron 12:55:22 11/05/04 (4)

Re: here's the lidar info. - john curl 16:14:53 11/05/04 (3)

Re: here's the lidar info. - jneutron 06:41:56 11/08/04 (2)

Re: here's the lidar info. - john curl 10:07:25 11/08/04 (1)

Re: here's the lidar info. - jneutron 10:28:27 11/08/04 (0)

Re: ahhh, some more time to kill..where was I? - john curl 10:54:15 11/02/04 (1)

HI John...nice post...I enjoyed it.. - jneutron 11:06:43 11/02/04 (0)

had a bit of time to kill ..so a few comments.. - jneutron 08:16:51 11/02/04 (0)

Jon, your spin doctoring is out of control - jneutron 05:54:45 11/02/04 (0)

Re: A comment about Steve Eddy and Cables & a reply by Steve? - john curl 12:42:40 11/01/04 (2)

your usual intellectual retort....arggghhh...I'm hit!!nt. - jneutron 12:47:36 11/01/04 (1)

Oh, btw, I responded to your other "intellectual" diatribe in general..here it is case ya missed it. - jneutron 13:48:35 11/01/04 (0)

Follow Ups

Oh, btw, I responded to your other "intellectual" diatribe in general..here it is case ya missed it. - jneutron 13:48:35 11/01/04 (0)

You can not post to an archived thread.