In Reply to: What Is The Biggest Problem With Speakers Today? posted by thetubeguy1954 on March 13, 2008 at 12:00:16:
> By that I mean which one problem ---once solved--- will make the most
> dramatic improvement with how speakers sound?
By far the biggest problem for accurate loudspeakers for the home (accurate in the sense of direct sound which is unambiguous - indirect sound is a different matter) is the market which is negligible in size compared to that for loudspeakers that are attractive for audiophile reasons. Clearly this is not a problem for audiophiles but only those that want to purchase accurate home loudspeakers at consumer rather then specialist prices.
For the home audio industry this is more of a solution than a problem and dates back to the seismic shift away from technical performance to perceived performance in the late 1970s. It has meant there is no requirement to invest in technical knowledge about the product in the manner of medium and high tech industries and the one or two small companies that make an effort in this direction can command specialist rather than consumer prices.
The "solution" would be to make audiophiles want accurate loudspeakers in preference to audiophile loudspeakers. One could almost certainly do this through education/marketing but it would be insane for the current audiophile industry to do so because it would be committing suicide. The shift from high fidelity to audiophile in home audio happened for business reasons and those companies that did not adapt their approach and continued with a focus on real technical performance disappeared from the home consumer market. Some tried to go up market, some went to professional audio but many were acquired by companies that used their brands and products in a more appropriate manner.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: What Is The Biggest Problem With Speakers Today? - andy19191 01:57:33 03/14/08 (28)
- Focus on a single parameter - E-Stat 14:39:58 03/14/08 (0)
- Those that responded to you are obviously quite insensitive. - bjh 10:58:11 03/14/08 (0)
- Once again... - mkuller 10:34:25 03/14/08 (5)
- RE: Once again... - andy19191 12:59:31 03/15/08 (4)
- So, Mike - E-Stat 13:15:32 03/15/08 (3)
- A classic circular argument... - robert young 14:43:23 03/15/08 (2)
- He's a clown - you should see his nose and shoes! (nt) - mkuller 10:05:00 03/17/08 (0)
- Enrage? - E-Stat 12:27:13 03/16/08 (0)
- Too many words to say that accuracy isn't actually that important - Don T 06:44:29 03/14/08 (4)
- RE: Too many words to say that accuracy isn't actually that important - andy19191 11:54:14 03/14/08 (3)
- RE: Too many words to say that accuracy isn't actually that important - Don T 14:02:45 03/14/08 (2)
- RE: Too many words to say that accuracy isn't actually that important - andy19191 12:51:25 03/15/08 (1)
- Indeed! - Don T 08:28:47 03/16/08 (0)
- On what experience are you basing your generalization? - robert young 04:52:21 03/14/08 (14)
- RE: On what experience are you basing your generalization? - andy19191 11:37:47 03/14/08 (9)
- This is hilarious... - mkuller 10:11:50 03/17/08 (0)
- Sorry it took so long to reply. I just spit up my lunch laughing. - robert young 12:48:03 03/15/08 (4)
- RE: Sorry it took so long to reply. I just spit up my lunch laughing. - andy19191 13:38:07 03/15/08 (3)
- Here's a little help. - robert young 13:50:36 03/15/08 (2)
- RE: Here's a little help. - andy19191 14:08:04 03/15/08 (1)
- It is a bit baffling - robert young 14:42:05 03/15/08 (0)
- RE: On what experience are you basing your generalization? - Don T 12:01:53 03/14/08 (2)
- RE: On what experience are you basing your generalization? - andy19191 12:46:38 03/15/08 (1)
- RE: On what experience are you basing your generalization? - Don T 08:42:07 03/16/08 (0)
- RE: Carnegie Hall doesn't measure flat - KlausR. 06:31:46 03/14/08 (3)
- You appear to have missed the point. - robert young 06:34:26 03/14/08 (2)
- Then explain (nt) - KlausR. 06:39:25 03/14/08 (1)
- Shall I poour you some coffee, as well, sir? - robert young 06:41:26 03/14/08 (0)