In Reply to: Ahh, most interesting... posted by unclestu52 on June 16, 2005 at 13:42:58:
Different, mebbe.Kal
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Better? - Kal Rubinson 14:10:03 06/16/05 (13)
- If you haven't tried them - unclestu52 17:08:29 06/16/05 (12)
- Re: Very good analysis, I agree 100% - geoffkait 08:57:52 06/17/05 (0)
- I have heard them - Kal Rubinson 18:39:49 06/16/05 (10)
- which model have you listenend to? NT - unclestu52 19:56:57 06/16/05 (9)
- Doesn't matter. - Kal Rubinson 07:56:42 06/17/05 (8)
- Here's what's interesting.... - unclestu52 10:22:55 06/17/05 (7)
- Yet another scheme for dissipating RF on the speaker cable. - Al Sekela 14:19:23 06/17/05 (5)
- an addendum - unclestu52 13:37:40 06/24/05 (0)
- Re: Yet another scheme for dissipating RF on the speaker cable. - unclestu52 15:31:09 06/21/05 (3)
- Yes, you don't want to put the RF on the ground. - Al Sekela 17:09:39 06/21/05 (2)
- Re: Yes, you don't want to put the RF on the ground. - unclestu52 10:54:40 06/22/05 (1)
- That could work very well. - Al Sekela 16:57:44 06/22/05 (0)
- OK. - Kal Rubinson 11:08:34 06/17/05 (0)