In Reply to: "Perfect copy." Hmm... posted by clarkjohnsen on May 17, 2005 at 08:01:38:
I'm with Mountain on this one.Actually I need to be careful here. The question isn't really what's on the disk, but what can be read from it. If a non-defective CD player (or other reader) extracts precisely the same data from the two disks then, except for time-domain errors (jitter) they MUST sound the same. The fact that many people have claimed otherwise for years is evidence that a sort of unexamined mysticism has invaded audiophiledom, to the detriment of the industry.
It's important to listen, and to keep an open mind. But it's equally important not to leave your brain at the door. You need it to examine and moderate your biases and the cultural influences we are all in thrall to.
An aside: the fact that you and others dismiss as "insulting" the suggestion that you're hearing things that aren't really there is strong evidence that you don't yet take this phenomenon as seriously as you should, that you don't respect it enough. It's not insulting to have your senses influenced by your mind (and, in turn, by cultural and environmental cues). It's inevitable...though we can, I think, moderate these effects with serious, concentrated effort. No matter how experienced you are (and I mean the general "you" here, not CJ in particular) you'll never be a reliable listener until you understand this and made that effort. Those who hear things the rest of us don't may have better ears, or better systems, but the reason may also be that they have less self-critical, less discerning minds.
Jim
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- 2 disks with identical data MUST sound the same. - Jim Austin 08:14:15 05/17/05 (19)
- Nope. - Jon Risch 17:24:17 05/17/05 (6)
- He has retracted his absolutist stance. And wisely so. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:14:05 05/18/05 (2)
- Right. - Jim Austin 11:59:34 05/18/05 (1)
- That's OK, PhDs don't usually express themselves well anyway. - clarkjohnsen 16:02:54 05/18/05 (0)
- I don't get it... - Jim Austin 03:53:37 05/18/05 (2)
- OK - Jon Risch 21:14:15 05/18/05 (1)
- Yes, I do agree - Jim Austin 04:15:46 05/19/05 (0)
- The fact that they usually don't highlights the importance of.... - Tom Dawson 13:52:17 05/17/05 (5)
- Interesting... - Jim Austin 13:58:31 05/17/05 (4)
- So Jim.... - Commuteman 17:20:08 05/17/05 (2)
- Re: So Jim.... - Jim Austin 03:49:38 05/18/05 (1)
- Sure, but it's a big if........ - Commuteman 15:00:38 05/18/05 (0)
- Re: Interesting... - Tom Dawson 14:23:52 05/17/05 (0)
- The Academy has spoken. The rest of us MUSTcower. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:57:28 05/17/05 (5)
- Very sad Clark - Jim Austin 13:43:59 05/17/05 (1)
- No, actually, you brought your affiliation up first. That's how I knew, fer godssake. Sad, indeed... but not for me. - clarkjohnsen 08:09:33 05/18/05 (0)
- Oooohhh..what a resounding technical comeback...nt - jneutron 12:01:29 05/17/05 (2)
- I see you are cowering. nt - clarkjohnsen 12:17:34 05/17/05 (1)
- quivering....big time...what, run outta technical words to gak up?nt - jneutron 12:57:09 05/17/05 (0)