In Reply to: RE: Maybe.... posted by fmak on June 11, 2010 at 22:04:49:
Even the resistance of the wires is going to change significantly with temperature and any vibration will move the wires and components and will affect stray capacitance and this will also affect the results, even at audio frequencies. Finally the Johnson–Nyquist noise is going to dominate, especially at room temperature, and it will be necessary to average measurements over an even longer period that a national lab with their low temperature apparatus (see photo) does while comparing voltage standards. Finally, I doubt that commercially available ovens or fridges will have sufficient stability so specialized equipment will need to be built.
This is something appropriate for a government boondoggle where cost is no object and possibly for an instrument maker who is planning to market to national labs. For audio equipment it is a fool's errand or marketing BS.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Maybe.... - Tony Lauck 06:31:05 06/12/10 (30)
- Are alternatively, that he has done it. nt - Norm 14:50:06 06/12/10 (29)
- No, most assuredly he has not - hermanesque 21:03:02 06/12/10 (27)
- No, most assuredly he has not - Roger_Paul 23:49:25 06/12/10 (26)
- like I said - hermanesque 08:10:01 06/13/10 (25)
- RE: like I said-Yes - fmak 01:46:51 06/14/10 (0)
- I think you need to add a little humility yourself. - Norm 08:56:14 06/13/10 (23)
- RE: I think you need to add a little humility yourself. - fmak 01:47:47 06/14/10 (2)
- If you are right that it is alchemy. Having heard, I don't think so. nt - Norm 15:16:06 06/14/10 (0)
- If you are right that it is alchemy. Having heard, I don't think so. nt - Norm 12:17:31 06/14/10 (0)
- not really - hermanesque 09:52:08 06/13/10 (19)
- A different example of a Unique Scheme - Tony Lauck 13:32:36 06/13/10 (17)
- RE: A different example of a Unique Scheme - fmak 01:52:07 06/14/10 (6)
- RE: A different example of a Unique Scheme - Tony Lauck 06:38:27 06/14/10 (4)
- A different example of a Unique Scheme - Roger_Paul 07:10:33 06/14/10 (3)
- RE: A different example of a Unique Scheme - Tony Lauck 07:57:15 06/14/10 (2)
- Bad experience - Roger_Paul 08:34:57 06/14/10 (1)
- RE: Bad experience - Tony Lauck 08:58:26 06/14/10 (0)
- RE: A different example of a Unique Scheme - Ryelands 02:46:21 06/14/10 (0)
- A different example of a Unique Scheme - Roger_Paul 17:11:19 06/13/10 (2)
- I already posted my advice for you. - Tony Lauck 17:42:50 06/13/10 (0)
- diversion - hermanesque 17:35:46 06/13/10 (0)
- another example to set off your BS detectors - hermanesque 16:02:42 06/13/10 (6)
- Yes, liike Thomas Edison. nt - Norm 20:10:18 06/13/10 (5)
- RE: Yes, liike Thomas Edison. nt - rick_m 20:38:34 06/13/10 (4)
- There is evidence he stole others' inventions. nt - Tony Lauck 08:24:32 06/14/10 (0)
- do a little research on Edison and discover he was in very large part a BS artist - hermanesque 21:44:43 06/13/10 (2)
- RE: do a little research on Edison and discover he was in very large part a BS artist - rick_m 06:08:15 06/14/10 (1)
- however - hermanesque 10:05:47 06/14/10 (0)
- It is harmonic distortion caused by the electronics - Norm 13:19:01 06/13/10 (0)
- RE: Are alternatively, that he has done it. nt - Tony Lauck 18:28:40 06/12/10 (0)