You dont know what you are talking about!

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Software induced jitter: how long is a piece of string? (Part 2) - cics 05:01:22 07/05/09 (61)

Great stuff, as funny as part 1 - Scrith 09:49:47 07/06/09 (13)

RE: Great stuff, as funny as part 1 - drrd 02:16:47 07/07/09 (0)

Thanks for adding the edit to your post. - Dawnrazor 22:05:12 07/06/09 (2)

Toss the carburetor... - Scrith 10:39:00 07/07/09 (0)

RE: Thanks for adding the edit to your post. - fmak 02:02:54 07/07/09 (0)

RE: Great stuff, as funny as part 1 - rick_m 11:38:24 07/06/09 (4)

Data for HW vs. SW - Scrith 12:12:05 07/06/09 (3)

RE: Data for HW vs. SW - rick_m 13:54:23 07/06/09 (2)

It's all Heisenberg's fault nt - Tony Lauck 14:29:48 07/06/09 (1)

He makes good crystal meth though (nt) - Scrith 15:45:25 07/06/09 (0)

Not funny at all - about the same as your previous posts on the subject. - carcass93 10:52:54 07/06/09 (3)

Analog-head stuck in the mud... - Scrith 12:22:30 07/06/09 (2)

RE: Analog-head stuck in the mud... - Tony Lauck 14:24:07 07/06/09 (1)

Digital data - Scrith 16:03:31 07/06/09 (0)

RE: Software induced jitter: how long is a piece of string? (Part 2) - Ryelands 09:35:50 07/06/09 (8)

Comments - Old Listener 15:38:41 07/06/09 (2)

RE: Comments - Ryelands 04:56:55 07/07/09 (1)

RE: Comments - Old Listener 10:09:51 07/07/09 (0)

Now that is more like it! - theob 10:51:49 07/06/09 (4)

RE: Now that is more like it! - aljordan 12:46:11 07/06/09 (3)

RE: Now that is more like it! - theob 06:08:43 07/07/09 (0)

You dont know what you are talking about! - Dawnrazor 00:00:27 07/07/09 (1)

RE: You don't know what you are talking about! - Ryelands 00:59:11 07/07/09 (0)

Who ever wrote this does not understand what jitter is!!!! - Gordon Rankin 08:16:56 07/06/09 (12)

RE: Who ever wrote this does not understand what jitter is!!!! - Roseval 03:03:46 07/07/09 (2)

and what do those clocks have to do with audio? nothing! - Gordon Rankin 08:32:21 07/07/09 (1)

You should know better than this. - Roseval 11:42:20 07/07/09 (0)

RE: Who ever wrote this does not understand what jitter is!!!! - Dawnrazor 21:31:17 07/06/09 (4)

Why does it have to always be jitter - Gordon Rankin 08:37:31 07/07/09 (3)

Because you can measure the reduction in Jitter distortion (i.e. lower Jrss and/or noise floor) - cics 17:08:45 07/07/09 (2)

RE: Because you can measure the reduction in Jitter distortion (i.e. lower Jrss and/or noise floor) - Tony Lauck 09:33:23 07/08/09 (1)

RE: Because you can measure the reduction in Jitter distortion (i.e. lower Jrss and/or noise floor) - cics 19:31:58 07/08/09 (0)

If it were that simple, we'd have "Perfect sound forever..." - cics 18:30:11 07/06/09 (3)

RE: If it were that simple, we'd have "Perfect sound forever..." - Phelonious Ponk 09:40:48 07/11/09 (0)

RE: If it were that simple, we'd have "Perfect sound forever..." - fmak 21:53:42 07/06/09 (1)

Fred thanks! NT - Gordon Rankin 08:38:38 07/07/09 (0)

RE: Software induced jitter: how long is a piece of string? (Part 2) - Tony Lauck 11:31:12 07/05/09 (23)

Clock therapy in isolation is not a cure - cics 07:45:40 07/06/09 (1)

RE: Clock therapy in isolation is not a cure - Tony Lauck 08:49:54 07/06/09 (0)

RE: Software induced jitter: how long is a piece of string? (Part 2) - fmak 07:10:37 07/06/09 (12)

Reducing clock frequency results in much lower power consumption - cics 08:16:35 07/06/09 (5)

RE: Reducing clock frequency results in much lower power consumption - idiot_savant 16:21:13 07/06/09 (1)

No such thing as cache stalls. Perhaps you meant cache thrashing? - cics 18:47:29 07/06/09 (0)

RE: Reducing clock frequency results in much lower power consumption - fmak 08:57:08 07/06/09 (2)

RE: Reducing clock frequency results in much lower power consumption - Tony Lauck 13:58:05 07/06/09 (1)

RE: Reducing clock frequency results in much lower power consumption - fmak 21:56:54 07/06/09 (0)

RE: Software induced jitter: how long is a piece of string? (Part 2) - theob 07:46:00 07/06/09 (5)

RE: Software induced jitter: how long is a piece of string? (Part 2) - fmak 08:02:38 07/06/09 (4)

RE: Software induced jitter: how long is a piece of string? (Part 2) - theob 08:18:47 07/06/09 (3)

RE: Software induced jitter: how long is a piece of string? (Part 2) - rick_m 12:07:19 07/06/09 (0)

RE: Software induced jitter: how long is a piece of string? (Part 2) - fmak 08:58:36 07/06/09 (1)

RE: Software induced jitter: how long is a piece of string? (Part 2) - theob 09:23:26 07/06/09 (0)

RE: Software induced jitter: how long is a piece of string? (Part 2) - drrd 13:26:13 07/05/09 (7)

If you have a theory on how the coupling works, let's hear it. nt - Tony Lauck 13:31:15 07/05/09 (6)

Complete de-coupling more useful... - drrd 15:13:28 07/05/09 (5)

RE: Complete de-coupling more useful... - Tony Lauck 07:51:36 07/06/09 (4)

RE: Complete de-coupling more useful... - drrd 09:30:16 07/06/09 (3)

RE: Complete de-coupling more useful... - Tony Lauck 11:05:27 07/06/09 (2)

RE: Complete de-coupling more useful... - drrd 11:17:50 07/06/09 (1)

RE: Complete de-coupling more useful... - rick_m 12:48:46 07/06/09 (0)

RE: Software induced jitter: how long is a piece of string? (Part 2) - theob 05:43:21 07/05/09 (0)

Follow Ups

You dont know what you are talking about! - Dawnrazor 00:00:27 07/07/09 (1)

RE: You don't know what you are talking about! - Ryelands 00:59:11 07/07/09 (0)

Post a Message!