In Reply to: RE: Thanks for keeping me honest posted by Charles Hansen on November 21, 2017 at 19:36:09:
"But this is *not* how electricity is carried in wires. Instead, applying a voltage to a copper wire sets up an electrical field in this wire. The free electrons in the copper move in response to the presence of this field. Yet they are not the same."
But isn't this how "signal" is carried in wires? Assuming a well designed circuit, what does all this gibberish have to do with not just modifying a signal, but improving it? Even if it did modify the signal, who appointed you guardian of what is best? Methinks you're pretty full of yourself.
Sir, I take my hat off to you. You may not be able to dazzle with brilliance, but you sure do know how to baffle with bullshit.
You are a miracle!
I feel like Steve Martin discovering just what Goldie Hawn was capable of in "House Sitter"
After reading your screed, which I can only assume to be a riposte to my simple question: "How does the piece of wood intrude upon the electrical signal and modify the signal?" I must concur with your opinion: "I have absolutely no idea."
What was the expression: the blind leading the blind? Here we have the clueless selling to the clueless.
JE
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Thanks for keeping me honest - Jaundiced Ear 21:08:09 11/21/17 (4)
- RE: Thanks for keeping me honest - AbeCollins 18:14:13 12/01/17 (0)
- RE: Thanks for keeping me honest - Ryelands 03:04:53 11/22/17 (2)
- RE: Thanks for keeping me honest - Jaundiced Ear 18:51:36 11/22/17 (1)
- RE: Thanks for keeping me honest - Ryelands 03:54:16 11/23/17 (0)