In Reply to: Bluetooth questions posted by neolith on November 9, 2017 at 07:35:26:
Sorry there is so much misinformation out on the internet.
The fact is that Bluetooth is more-or-less a lower powered version of Wi-Fi. It was developed so that battery-operated devices (such as mice, keyboards, et cetera) would not drain the battery by using a 500mW transmitter (the Wi-Fi minimum standard). Therefore Bluetooth is limited to 50mW of transmitted power.
The next problem is the antenna. Even at Wi-Fi/Bluetooth frequencies (the exact same frequencies used in microwave oven, by the way), the proper antenna design for optimal connection is too large to fit into a mouse. While one *could* fit into a keyboard, it would be directional and have nulls in certain orientations that could potentially cause a loss of link if the keyboard were oriented improperly or too far away.
The low power limits the range, which is the only reason that the Bluetooth standard also limits the transmitted signal bandwidth. Since Bluetooth and Wi-Fi operate at the same frequency, they can support the same signal data transfer rate. It's just that the higher the data rate goes, the more difficult it is to maintain the connection.
In a way, increasing the bandwidth of the transmitted signal has the same effect as lowering the transmitter power - reduced range.
After that, everything comes down to consumer expectations. Nobody expects a Bluetooth wireless mouse to connect from 50' away. But they do expect Wi-Fi to connect from 50' away. Since Wi-Fi often will not connect from 50' away, they have been relaxing the standards and allowing more power to be transmitted via Wi-Fi, along with other "tricks" to meet consumer expectation.
There are at least two problems you will run into with the suggestions posted so far:
1) If you transmit your audio data via Wi-Fi (instead of a wired network connection), I have heard countless reports of sonic degradation that may be equal or worse than the sonic degradation imposed by Bluetooth's mandatory lossy compression.
2) The fact that both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth operate at the same frequency as your microwave oven means that using either is literally turning your house into a low-level microwave oven. The health effects are currently unknown, although the WHO has already declared Wi-Fi as a "probable carcinogen". The studies are mixed, but if one separates them by source of funding, then over 80% of papers independently-funded find links between microwave radiation (including mobile phones as well as Wi-Fi/Bluetooth) and health hazards, while the percentage of studies funded by the military or the microwave industry have about the reverse portion showing a link. The result is about a 50/50 split, so that the microwave industry can claim that "the jury is still out".
Still Bluetooth is safer from two general standpoints - it is lower powered, and it almost always has automatic shutoff systems to conserve battery life when not in use. In contrast, almost all Wi-Fi (along with all modern cell phones) are constantly transmitting unless the user deliberately turns them off manually. (Pulsed or intermittent radiation in the case of cell-phones.) Caveat emptor.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Actual Bluetooth Answers - Charles Hansen 04:30:07 11/10/17 (45)
- RE: Actual Bluetooth Answers - chocolate_lover9999@yahoo.com 09:59:15 11/10/17 (1)
- Esactly - Charles Hansen 10:54:36 11/10/17 (0)
- "Don't beleive everything you read on the internet".......Abraham Lincoln...... - Cut-Throat 09:18:13 11/10/17 (37)
- That's rich - Charles Hansen 10:43:40 11/10/17 (36)
- As Rich as Myrtle Blocks ...................................nt - Cut-Throat 16:35:36 11/10/17 (35)
- Apologies (stupidly long yet likely educational) - Charles Hansen 03:58:10 11/11/17 (34)
- RE: Apologies (short, but possibly also educational) - Jaundiced Ear 00:24:14 11/17/17 (16)
- RE: Since we are doing a lot of favorites of late - riboge 05:19:53 11/20/17 (2)
- RE: Since we are doing a lot of favorites of late - Ryelands 06:35:53 11/20/17 (1)
- Better yet, watch this TED talk by Evelyn - Charles Hansen 08:06:15 11/20/17 (0)
- Very short as well.... - alan m. kafton 13:17:23 11/19/17 (12)
- False equivalence - Jaundiced Ear 14:38:22 11/19/17 (11)
- RE: False equivalence - Ryelands 15:53:23 11/19/17 (10)
- Thanks for keeping me honest - Jaundiced Ear 17:48:39 11/21/17 (6)
- RE: Thanks for keeping me honest - Charles Hansen 19:36:09 11/21/17 (5)
- RE: Thanks for keeping me honest - Jaundiced Ear 21:08:09 11/21/17 (4)
- RE: Thanks for keeping me honest - AbeCollins 18:14:13 12/01/17 (0)
- RE: Thanks for keeping me honest - Ryelands 03:04:53 11/22/17 (2)
- RE: Thanks for keeping me honest - Jaundiced Ear 18:51:36 11/22/17 (1)
- RE: Thanks for keeping me honest - Ryelands 03:54:16 11/23/17 (0)
- RE: False equivalence - Charles Hansen 08:15:45 11/20/17 (2)
- RE: False equivalence - Ryelands 09:00:33 11/20/17 (1)
- RE: False equivalence - Charles Hansen 09:49:17 11/21/17 (0)
- So can we now say that a slow-witted Audiophile is .... - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 17:38:39 11/14/17 (0)
- After Reading - Dynobot 08:56:47 11/11/17 (15)
- RE: After Reading - Charles Hansen 08:15:04 11/12/17 (11)
- Life is a balance......................... - Cut-Throat 12:06:19 11/12/17 (9)
- RE: Life is a balance......................... - Charles Hansen 07:49:27 11/13/17 (2)
- RE: Life is a balance......................... - Ryelands 10:52:17 11/13/17 (1)
- RE: Life is a balance......................... - Charles Hansen 20:31:02 11/13/17 (0)
- RE: Life is a balance......................... - Dynobot 14:46:01 11/12/17 (5)
- RE: Life is a balance......................... - Mercman 08:00:02 11/14/17 (4)
- RE: Life is a balance......................... - Charles Hansen 17:24:55 11/16/17 (2)
- RE: Life is a balance......................... - Mercman 01:49:25 11/17/17 (1)
- RE: Life is a balance......................... - Charles Hansen 12:28:17 11/18/17 (0)
- That's such a wonderful story.... - Dynobot 17:23:47 11/14/17 (0)
- RE: After Reading - Dynobot 11:42:11 11/12/17 (0)
- Yes, you and me both!..................nt - Cut-Throat 12:19:07 11/11/17 (2)
- RE: Yes, you and me both!..................nt - Dynobot 13:33:37 11/11/17 (1)
- Yup............. - Cut-Throat 14:09:41 11/11/17 (0)
- RE: Actual Bluetooth Answers - neolith 06:06:25 11/10/17 (4)
- RE: Actual Bluetooth Answers - Charles Hansen 07:39:55 11/10/17 (3)
- he most recent research shows that it requires less than 10 years - oldmkvi 08:23:56 11/10/17 (1)
- RE: he most recent research shows that it requires less than 10 years - Charles Hansen 10:46:32 11/10/17 (0)
- PS - Charles Hansen 07:42:56 11/10/17 (0)