In Reply to: RE: -3db @18 Hz?. Doesn't horn physics get in the way here? NT posted by Paul Eizik on November 28, 2021 at 07:37:39:
I wrote about that configuration in a 50Hz horn, but never used it for sub bass horns. In that application I found that a sealed rear chamber works just as well, so the added complexity of venting the chamber into the throat wasn't justified. I still vent the chamber into the throat with some of my midbass horns, but response doesn't go much lower than venting outside of the horn, and there is a decided sensitivity step below the horn cutoff frequency. Judging by the horn path length that's possible with this new Jublilee it can't have a horn cutoff frequency much below 35Hz, so if it's -3dB at 18Hz that's the product of EQ.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: -3db @18 Hz?. Doesn't horn physics get in the way here? NT - Bill Fitzmaurice 09:25:00 11/28/21 (2)
- RE: -3db @18 Hz?. Doesn't horn physics get in the way here? NT - Paul Eizik 16:55:09 11/28/21 (1)
- RE: looks like Roy Delgado read your article - Bill Fitzmaurice 05:01:33 11/29/21 (0)