It's "physics." - racerguy

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Some recent SACD vs DVD-A sales figures. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 04:12:58 11/08/03 (81)

Happy 3rd Anniversary! - Eric LeRouge 03:47:32 11/10/03 (0)

Re: Some recent SACD vs DVD-A sales figures. - Bob Olhsson 18:52:20 11/09/03 (0)

Re: Some recent SACD vs DVD-A sales figures. - fmak 00:23:38 11/09/03 (62)

Re: Some recent SACD vs DVD-A sales figures. - Martin . 04:25:16 11/09/03 (61)

You and Frank need to get together and synch up your stories... - Methos 20:36:53 11/09/03 (1)

No, we're entirely autonomous agents ;-) {n.t.} - Martin . 08:37:10 11/10/03 (0)

I must be deaf - tailspn 13:39:13 11/09/03 (10)

What were the mics conveying? . . . - Martin . 13:53:09 11/09/03 (0)

Don't bother - Stephen 13:50:24 11/09/03 (8)

Wrong... - Frank. 14:25:34 11/09/03 (7)

massive backpedaling - tunenut 15:36:40 11/09/03 (2)

So what? - Frank. 01:06:11 11/10/03 (1)

the early recordings are fine - tunenut 08:33:46 11/10/03 (0)

More back-peddling - Stephen 15:02:06 11/09/03 (3)

Re: More back-peddling - Frank. 15:09:41 11/09/03 (2)

Re: More back-peddling - Stephen 15:14:49 11/09/03 (1)

indistinguishable ? - Frank. 00:34:01 11/10/03 (0)

And Fmak, also don't forget . . . - Martin . 04:58:22 11/09/03 (47)

Re: And Fmak, also don't forget . . . - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 05:58:01 11/09/03 (46)

No clue ? - Frank. 09:57:55 11/09/03 (4)

Re: No clue ? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:49:24 11/09/03 (3)

Yes, - Frank. 11:30:37 11/09/03 (2)

Re: Yes, - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 11:45:14 11/09/03 (1)

Clues... - Frank, 11:54:47 11/09/03 (0)

>> I don't have a clue if the two-channel is a fold-down or not << . . . - Martin . 08:07:22 11/09/03 (38)

Re: >> I don't have a clue if the two-channel is a fold-down or not << . . . - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:33:15 11/09/03 (37)

Re: >> I don't have a clue if the two-channel is a fold-down or not << . . . - Martin . 11:40:24 11/09/03 (36)

Re: >> I don't have a clue if the two-channel is a fold-down or not << . . . - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:42:44 11/09/03 (35)

Mixing is NOT bad . . . - Martin . 15:05:41 11/09/03 (34)

it ain't good - tunenut 19:11:18 11/09/03 (4)

Clarification: Mixing using one-bit arithmetic ain't good . . . - Martin . 07:41:52 11/10/03 (0)

Ok, 2 mics' - Frank. 04:50:53 11/10/03 (0)

Re: it ain't bad . . . - Martin . 02:14:47 11/10/03 (1)

can't speak to specific m/c recordings - tunenut 08:44:48 11/10/03 (0)

You should try sticking to subjects you understand - racerguy 18:23:00 11/09/03 (28)

It's called appreciating "The laws of physics" -- something which you can't seem to understand. . . - Martin . 02:00:11 11/10/03 (27)

Re: It's called appreciating "The laws of physics" -- something which you can't seem to understand. . . - racerguy 18:56:03 11/10/03 (0)

Anyway, Racerguy . . . - Martin . 02:42:59 11/10/03 (25)

Poor Martin... - racerguy 18:54:56 11/10/03 (24)

Racerguy, - Martin . 01:16:27 11/11/03 (23)

Re: Racerguy, - racerguy 06:31:55 11/11/03 (22)

Prove me wrong or fuck off. {n.t.} - Martin . 06:49:51 11/11/03 (21)

It's "physics." - racerguy 07:11:39 11/11/03 (20)

Here's my system; and prove, or disprove the following hypothesis:- - Martin . 07:38:14 11/11/03 (19)

Yawn - racerguy 18:04:15 11/11/03 (12)

Rotel and Denon ? - Jack Seaton 20:28:01 11/11/03 (11)

I wasn't surprised - were you? - racerguy 06:08:44 11/12/03 (3)

Not really. - Jack Seaton 18:56:21 11/14/03 (1)

Re: Not really. - Martin . 04:10:15 11/15/03 (0)

I guess that's because . . . - Martin . 07:08:57 11/12/03 (0)

Yet more diversion . . . - Martin . 03:09:18 11/12/03 (6)

are you losing your mind? - tunenut 08:35:00 11/12/03 (1)

Jack and Racer do not bring out the best in people . . . - Martin . 09:02:11 11/12/03 (0)

Weak (nt) - racerguy 06:09:03 11/12/03 (3)

Pathetically weak. - Jack Seaton 19:04:09 11/14/03 (1)

Yet more baseless subjectivity. {n.t.} - Martin . 03:56:40 11/15/03 (0)

Yes you really are. {n.t.} - Martin . 06:20:22 11/12/03 (0)

you are not in the realm of physics - tunenut 08:44:24 11/11/03 (5)

Oh yes I am . . . - Martin . 09:27:00 11/11/03 (4)

I'm not going to get into this... - tunenut 10:30:03 11/11/03 (3)

You would say that, wouldn't you? My case is proven, (despite the attempted diversions). {n.t.} - Martin . 10:34:27 11/11/03 (2)

congratulations, Einstein (NT) - tunenut 10:45:38 11/11/03 (1)

Einstein? Quantum physics? Wrong asylum. :-) Anyway . . . - Martin . 11:07:08 11/11/03 (0)

Off topic (somewhat).......Chris, did you get your modded SACD player yet?? - HarryB 06:38:12 11/09/03 (1)

See my reply to Guss2 below. [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 07:09:35 11/09/03 (0)

you have truly crossed to the Dark Side... - tunenut 14:22:31 11/08/03 (3)

Re: you have truly crossed to the Dark Side... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:36:10 11/09/03 (2)

this is why it will be so interesting... - tunenut 09:40:42 11/09/03 (1)

Re: this is why it will be so interesting... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 11:14:03 11/09/03 (0)

A few things . . . - Martin . 11:54:42 11/08/03 (1)

Re: A few things . . . - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:20:23 11/08/03 (0)

This is good to hear Chris. - Guss2 07:54:04 11/08/03 (6)

Re: This is good to hear Chris. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:52:50 11/08/03 (5)

You could do worse. - Guss2 10:17:21 11/08/03 (4)

Re: You could do worse. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:42:00 11/08/03 (3)

How do you have the player set up? - Guss2 08:45:20 11/09/03 (1)

Re: How do you have the player set up? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:59:48 11/09/03 (0)

That's a no brainer. I forgot about your DAC.nt - Guss2 11:08:32 11/08/03 (0)

Re: Some recent SACD vs DVD-A sales figures. - patrickU 04:32:45 11/08/03 (2)

Re: Some recent SACD vs DVD-A sales figures. - raffells 06:55:59 11/08/03 (1)

Re: Some recent SACD vs DVD-A sales figures. - patrickU 07:23:06 11/08/03 (0)

Follow Ups

It's "physics." - racerguy 07:11:39 11/11/03 (20)

Here's my system; and prove, or disprove the following hypothesis:- - Martin . 07:38:14 11/11/03 (19)

Yawn - racerguy 18:04:15 11/11/03 (12)

Rotel and Denon ? - Jack Seaton 20:28:01 11/11/03 (11)

I wasn't surprised - were you? - racerguy 06:08:44 11/12/03 (3)

Not really. - Jack Seaton 18:56:21 11/14/03 (1)

Re: Not really. - Martin . 04:10:15 11/15/03 (0)

I guess that's because . . . - Martin . 07:08:57 11/12/03 (0)

Yet more diversion . . . - Martin . 03:09:18 11/12/03 (6)

are you losing your mind? - tunenut 08:35:00 11/12/03 (1)

Jack and Racer do not bring out the best in people . . . - Martin . 09:02:11 11/12/03 (0)

Weak (nt) - racerguy 06:09:03 11/12/03 (3)

Pathetically weak. - Jack Seaton 19:04:09 11/14/03 (1)

Yet more baseless subjectivity. {n.t.} - Martin . 03:56:40 11/15/03 (0)

Yes you really are. {n.t.} - Martin . 06:20:22 11/12/03 (0)

you are not in the realm of physics - tunenut 08:44:24 11/11/03 (5)

Oh yes I am . . . - Martin . 09:27:00 11/11/03 (4)

I'm not going to get into this... - tunenut 10:30:03 11/11/03 (3)

You would say that, wouldn't you? My case is proven, (despite the attempted diversions). {n.t.} - Martin . 10:34:27 11/11/03 (2)

congratulations, Einstein (NT) - tunenut 10:45:38 11/11/03 (1)

Einstein? Quantum physics? Wrong asylum. :-) Anyway . . . - Martin . 11:07:08 11/11/03 (0)