In Reply to: Let's talk Miles (and SACD) posted by Dave Pogue on May 12, 2003 at 12:44:33:
Just a few thoughts.
We are obviously coming from different directions. If I had 29 Miles LPs and a good collection overall, not to mention a TNT, I doubt I would have been drawn to SACD. If so, it wouldn't have been for audible reasons. I recently bought the Scout, which granted is no TNT, but no slouch either.I can't account for your preference for the CD over the SACD, except to wonder if you were selecting for a preference of something else (polarity? level?--the CDs are generally mastered louder, esp KoB) that wasn't properly controlled. But even that is a weak hypothesis because on my system (SCD-1->VAC Avatar->Nautilus 802 via Goertz MI2) the SACDs destroy the CDs in all areas regardless of precise attention to polarity or setting level. I can't think of any area CD does better than SACD, unless you prefer that unnatural, "etched" quality that CD does so well. Or the paper-thin quality of the soundstage I associate with CD that sounds like it is on the verge of shattering at high volumes.
Vinyl does things better than SACD. I do not dispute that. Particularly soundstage holistics and top-to-bottom smoothness/natural timbres, but that's only vinyl done right. Vinyl done poorly (which is much better represented than those done right in my collection) is a horror that makes even the worst SACDs in my collection seem heavenly, those being the Higgins and Beirach titles from Venus' first batch.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Let's talk Miles (and SACD) - Jazz Inmate 15:31:17 05/12/03 (2)
- KOB multi-channel - DD 19:28:09 05/12/03 (1)
- Never heard the multichannel mix - Jazz Inmate 09:12:07 05/13/03 (0)