RE: Scientific method?

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - DBT or not DBT - Ozzie 19:07:52 12/02/14 (150)

RE: DBT or not DBT - jamestavegia@gmail.com 03:42:13 12/12/14 (0)

RE: DBT or not DBT - stehno 20:08:26 12/05/14 (12)

RE: DBT or not DBT - middleground 12:21:47 12/08/14 (1)

RE: DBT or not DBT - stehno 20:53:30 12/09/14 (0)

RE: DBT or not DBT - stehno 21:51:50 12/07/14 (4)

Just a detail - E-Stat 11:40:03 12/09/14 (0)

RE: DBT or not DBT - Tony Lauck 18:31:29 12/08/14 (2)

RE: DBT or not DBT - stehno 20:56:33 12/09/14 (1)

RE: DBT or not DBT - The Bored 08:48:48 12/10/14 (0)

stehno: - The Bored 14:18:01 12/07/14 (0)

RE: DBT or not DBT - mkuller 10:57:05 12/06/14 (3)

RE: DBT or not DBT -- I think i disagree . . . - goldenthal 15:39:19 02/15/15 (2)

RE: DBT or not DBT -- I think i disagree . . . - mkuller 15:48:30 02/15/15 (1)

RES IPSA LOQUITUR! nt - goldenthal 16:14:41 02/15/15 (0)

The problem is… - tomservo 09:44:30 12/05/14 (6)

RE: The problem is… - middleground 06:19:14 12/07/14 (0)

And, if you want to be taken seriously... - E-Stat 11:04:10 12/05/14 (4)

RE: And, if you want to be taken seriously... - Tony Lauck 18:52:24 12/05/14 (3)

Why not make it easy enough - E-Stat 09:15:35 12/06/14 (2)

That's how to train. - Tony Lauck 09:43:42 12/06/14 (1)

"That's how to train." - E-Stat 08:12:50 12/07/14 (0)

Somehow - I though the subject - kavakidd 23:33:59 12/03/14 (10)

DBTs are a fitting subject for Prophead. nt - Tony Lauck 18:49:49 12/05/14 (0)

RE: Somehow - I though the subject - Pat D 07:39:33 12/04/14 (8)

RE: Somehow - I though the subject - RGA 20:50:15 12/04/14 (5)

The Single Biggest Failure with DBT Proponents is... - E-Stat 09:03:10 12/05/14 (3)

RE: The Single Biggest Failure with DBT Proponents is... - Pat D 20:45:38 12/06/14 (1)

RE: The Single Biggest Failure with DBT Proponents is... - E-Stat 08:25:39 12/07/14 (0)

Actually... - mkuller 10:04:27 12/05/14 (0)

RE: Somehow - I though the subject - Pat D 03:13:43 12/05/14 (0)

I don't remember you knocking down anything or anybody. - carcass93 20:04:44 12/04/14 (0)

RE: Somehow - I though the subject - mkuller 10:48:57 12/04/14 (0)

My favorites... - E-Stat 12:48:04 12/03/14 (0)

I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - carcass93 12:39:30 12/03/14 (96)

possibly of use - tomservo 06:38:25 12/10/14 (5)

RE: possibly of use - Dave_K 12:30:16 12/12/14 (4)

RE: possibly of use - Pat D 18:38:20 12/12/14 (1)

RE: possibly of use - Dave_K 08:45:52 12/15/14 (0)

RE: possibly of use - tomservo 18:16:30 12/12/14 (1)

No, I failed to get a positive result in the SBT - Dave_K 08:43:23 12/15/14 (0)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - middleground 02:42:33 12/05/14 (56)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Dave_K 11:26:08 12/05/14 (55)

To win arguements? - mkuller 14:42:59 12/05/14 (2)

You're right that nobody wins, but they keep trying (nt) - Dave_K 05:18:34 12/07/14 (1)

The Dogged Pursuit of Mediocrity - E-Stat 08:37:42 12/07/14 (0)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - middleground 14:06:32 12/05/14 (50)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Tony Lauck 18:46:23 12/05/14 (48)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Pat D 19:55:26 12/06/14 (11)

Scientific method? - mkuller 12:16:37 12/07/14 (8)

RE: Scientific method? - Pat D 16:00:43 12/08/14 (7)

RE: Scientific method? - Tony Lauck 18:40:40 12/08/14 (0)

RE: Scientific method? - mkuller 16:44:52 12/08/14 (5)

RE: Scientific method? - Pat D 18:54:10 12/08/14 (4)

RE: Scientific method? - mkuller 12:07:14 12/09/14 (3)

RE: Scientific method? - Pat D 20:07:13 12/09/14 (2)

RE: Scientific method? - mkuller 20:11:39 12/09/14 (1)

RE: Scientific method? - Pat D 20:38:40 12/09/14 (0)

And yet... - E-Stat 08:41:40 12/07/14 (1)

Novelty toy makers, not experimental scientists - Tony Lauck 15:19:26 12/07/14 (0)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - John Atkinson 09:20:36 12/06/14 (35)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Tony Lauck 10:45:15 12/06/14 (34)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - stehno 12:26:05 12/14/14 (2)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Tony Lauck 13:27:16 12/14/14 (1)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - stehno 14:41:13 12/14/14 (0)

BTW - E-Stat 14:36:06 12/07/14 (30)

RE: BTW - Pat D 19:28:44 12/08/14 (29)

RE: BTW - E-Stat 08:18:58 12/09/14 (28)

RE: BTW - Pat D 20:15:00 12/09/14 (27)

Finally, an accurate amplifier... - mkuller 21:37:45 12/09/14 (23)

RE: Finally, an accurate amplifier... - Pat D 13:50:13 12/10/14 (22)

RE: Finally, an accurate amplifier... - Tony Lauck 21:19:51 12/11/14 (8)

RE: Finally, an accurate amplifier... - Pat D 16:27:01 12/12/14 (7)

RE: Finally, an accurate amplifier... - Tony Lauck 17:40:55 12/12/14 (6)

RE: Finally, an accurate amplifier... - Pat D 18:41:54 12/12/14 (1)

Oh, you "suggest"? That's so generous of you.... - carcass93 15:25:40 12/13/14 (0)

Sorry - E-Stat 18:04:08 12/12/14 (3)

RE: Sorry - Tony Lauck 18:54:54 12/12/14 (2)

RE: Sorry - E-Stat 07:09:33 12/13/14 (1)

RE: Sorry - Tony Lauck 09:52:52 12/13/14 (0)

The only one you mention... - mkuller 11:07:39 12/11/14 (12)

RE: The only one you mention... - Tony Lauck 21:17:01 12/11/14 (1)

I always... - mkuller 10:40:54 12/12/14 (0)

Ditto - E-Stat 11:59:45 12/11/14 (9)

Maybe PatD will tell us... - mkuller 12:25:01 12/11/14 (8)

Perhaps accurate for those who listen to - E-Stat 12:34:55 12/11/14 (7)

RE: Perhaps accurate for those who listen to - Pat D 16:33:03 12/12/14 (6)

Wrong amp - we're talking about the 4B-SST...(nt) - mkuller 10:06:19 12/13/14 (4)

RE: Wrong amp - we're talking about the 4B-SST...(nt) - Pat D 11:12:03 12/14/14 (3)

RE: Wrong amp - we're talking about the 4B-SST... - mkuller 11:28:15 12/14/14 (2)

RE: Wrong amp - we're talking about the 4B-SST... - Pat D 10:43:51 12/15/14 (0)

RE: Wrong amp - we're talking about the 4B-SST... - lord addleford 12:13:17 12/14/14 (0)

Thanks for ongoing humor! - E-Stat 16:48:15 12/12/14 (0)

RE: BTW - E-Stat 20:37:09 12/09/14 (2)

RE: BTW - Pat D 10:56:17 12/10/14 (1)

RE: BTW - E-Stat 10:58:46 12/11/14 (0)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Dave_K 14:37:31 12/05/14 (0)

Much more elaborate than I'd ever could (or bother) to put it - ... - carcass93 12:23:17 12/05/14 (0)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - kerr 05:24:23 12/04/14 (23)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - bjh 17:41:07 12/04/14 (15)

True - kerr 05:31:39 12/05/14 (14)

RE: True - Pat D 16:37:24 12/08/14 (12)

I stand corrected - kerr 04:54:25 12/09/14 (11)

RE: I stand corrected - Pat D 11:14:57 12/10/14 (10)

One can make any number of observations to the obvious... - E-Stat 15:50:08 12/12/14 (2)

RE: One can make any number of observations to the obvious... - Pat D 18:53:21 12/12/14 (1)

RE: One can make any number of observations to the obvious... - Tony Lauck 19:25:07 12/12/14 (0)

Science, once again rears its... - mkuller 19:04:40 12/11/14 (5)

RE: Science, once again rears its... - Pat D 18:27:33 12/12/14 (4)

"Whoever said that an audio DBT was a test of audio component differences?" - E-Stat 07:16:15 12/13/14 (3)

RE: "Whoever said that an audio DBT was a test of audio component differences?" - Pat D 16:14:11 12/13/14 (2)

I'll leave you with this episode of the absurd :) - E-Stat 17:00:20 12/13/14 (1)

RE: I'll leave you with this episode of the absurd :) - Pat D 10:32:44 12/14/14 (0)

Great Debate - kerr 04:58:22 12/11/14 (0)

Word nt - bjh 19:32:34 12/05/14 (0)

On that topic... looky here: - carcass93 09:51:12 12/04/14 (6)

Missing AJinFLA? - E-Stat 16:25:05 12/12/14 (0)

Did you notice? - kerr 05:17:00 12/09/14 (2)

Yeah... but at least he's not an amplifier manufacturer. - carcass93 12:08:17 12/09/14 (1)

Unless it was amps for skating rinks or cowboy bars (nt) - kerr 04:47:45 12/10/14 (0)

RE: On that topic... looky here: - Tony Lauck 22:32:28 12/04/14 (1)

It's the triumph of Pure Science, happening right there, before our eyes. - carcass93 08:48:45 12/05/14 (0)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Pat D 18:23:41 12/03/14 (8)

"Whoever said one person's DBT results apply to another person?" - you did. - carcass93 09:25:26 12/04/14 (3)

RE: "Whoever said one person's DBT results apply to another person?" - you did. - Pat D 10:13:18 12/04/14 (2)

Don't you know that Teflon is bad for your health? - carcass93 11:48:21 12/04/14 (1)

RE: Don't you know that Teflon is bad for your health? - Tony Lauck 18:28:59 12/05/14 (0)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Tony Lauck 18:46:30 12/03/14 (3)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - regmac 08:06:16 12/05/14 (1)

RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Tony Lauck 10:00:23 12/05/14 (0)

RE: Haha.....I think that sums it up nicely :) nt - navman 08:46:43 12/04/14 (0)

Nobody In Audio Does True DBT .......... - Todd Krieger 09:09:29 12/03/14 (6)

RE: Nobody In Audio Does True DBT .......... - Kal Rubinson 14:00:30 12/03/14 (5)

RE: Nobody In Audio Does True DBT .......... - mkuller 19:08:46 12/03/14 (3)

Depends on the design of the test. - Kal Rubinson 20:03:59 12/03/14 (2)

Can't argue with that... - mkuller 10:51:43 12/04/14 (1)

Audio DBT - Kal Rubinson 12:46:41 12/04/14 (0)

RE: Nobody In Audio Does True DBT .......... - Todd Krieger 16:04:30 12/03/14 (0)

RE: DBT or not DBT - middleground 08:13:46 12/03/14 (3)

RE: DBT or not DBT - Pat D 03:46:32 12/05/14 (2)

You can criticize HP all you want... - mkuller 10:02:48 12/05/14 (1)

RE: You can criticize HP all you want... - Pat D 16:14:59 12/08/14 (0)

RE: DBT or not DBT - navman 08:02:55 12/03/14 (5)

RE: DBT or not DBT - Pat D 18:10:08 12/03/14 (4)

RE: DBT or not DBT - navman 08:43:27 12/04/14 (3)

RE: DBT or not DBT - Pat D 10:11:49 12/04/14 (2)

RE: DBT or not DBT - navman 11:15:42 12/04/14 (1)

RE: DBT or not DBT - Dave_K 14:14:22 12/05/14 (0)

RE: DBT or not DBT - RGA 23:53:24 12/02/14 (0)

RE: DBT or not DBT - stehno 21:15:19 12/02/14 (0)

Another round? - mkuller 20:59:36 12/02/14 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Scientific method? - Pat D 20:07:13 12/09/14 (2)

RE: Scientific method? - mkuller 20:11:39 12/09/14 (1)

RE: Scientific method? - Pat D 20:38:40 12/09/14 (0)

Post a Message!