In Reply to: Let's take a British magazine as an example... posted by RGA on March 17, 2006 at 13:19:01:
the oto is a classic piece.....
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - My major problem with Stereophile's recommended components - franjy 10:47:21 03/16/06 (45)
- The realities of manufacturing... - Al Sekela 16:02:44 03/18/06 (0)
- Remember that Stereophile's recommended components are just filler to avoid other reviews. - Norm 14:44:42 03/17/06 (0)
- Personally, I'm kinda relieved - NOTHING - kavakidd 07:06:34 03/17/06 (3)
- I agree: Our best kept secrets are others' loss - Frihed89 03:25:50 03/18/06 (2)
- Perhaps Christopher Buckley can take it on, and... - John Marks 16:16:56 03/18/06 (1)
- Re: Perhaps Christopher Buckley can take it on, and... - Frihed89 06:27:01 03/19/06 (0)
- "Not reviewed in too long a time" is utterly disingenuous. - shamburg 05:52:31 03/17/06 (6)
- Perfect excuse for pruning an unbelievably huge list ... without saying anything bad about any component that's removed - Richard BassNut Greene 07:45:55 03/21/06 (0)
- Re: "Not reviewed in too long a time" is utterly disingenuous. - Bruce from DC 07:28:27 03/17/06 (4)
- Re: "Not reviewed in too long a time" is utterly disingenuous. - John N 12:53:23 03/17/06 (2)
- Re: "Not reviewed in too long a time" is utterly disingenuous. - Bruce from DC 15:21:44 03/17/06 (1)
- Re: "Not reviewed in too long a time" is utterly disingenuous. - John N 22:11:15 03/17/06 (0)
- I think the attenuated, evolving list is for expediency, more than anything else. - shamburg 08:23:33 03/17/06 (0)
- Re: My major problem with Stereophile's recommended components - middleground 05:18:08 03/17/06 (8)
- Re: My major problem with Stereophile's recommended components - Kal Rubinson 08:51:06 03/17/06 (2)
- Re: My major problem with Stereophile's recommended components - Dave Pogue 09:24:23 03/17/06 (1)
- Ha. - Kal Rubinson 11:05:52 03/17/06 (0)
- Re: My major problem with Stereophile's recommended components - Wendell Narrod 07:12:48 03/17/06 (4)
- My opinion on Stereophile's recommended components - Ozzie 20:42:05 03/21/06 (0)
- Re: My major problem with Stereophile's recommended components - middleground 16:49:02 03/17/06 (2)
- Re: My major problem with Stereophile's recommended components - Wendell Narrod 17:13:53 03/17/06 (1)
- Re: My major problem with Stereophile's recommended components - middleground 09:42:25 03/18/06 (0)
- If they kept old stuff in, where would they fit the new gear? - AbeCollins 18:33:06 03/16/06 (6)
- Abe where do you keep all that stuff - nightdoggy 08:33:37 03/24/06 (0)
- Re: If they kept old stuff in, where would they fit the new gear? - middleground 16:52:13 03/17/06 (0)
- Re: If they kept old stuff in, where would they fit the new gear? - anthonyh 08:24:03 03/17/06 (3)
- No mystery - John Atkinson 10:59:07 03/17/06 (2)
- Re: No mystery - anthonyh 10:33:26 03/20/06 (0)
- Re: No mystery - middleground 16:54:27 03/17/06 (0)
- is the Marantz SA-8260 sttll in production? - hifitommy 17:57:24 03/16/06 (2)
- ps. Even that Marantz page makes mention of the Stereophile rating! nt - bjh 18:33:58 03/16/06 (0)
- Fortunately it appears to be! - bjh 18:32:34 03/16/06 (0)
- Re: My major problem with Stereophile's recommended components - bjh 13:35:06 03/16/06 (0)
- Well why buy the magazine then? Nobody is forcing you to read it... - RGA 11:08:26 03/16/06 (11)
- Re: Well why buy the magazine then? Nobody is forcing you to read it... - jdouglas51 06:23:26 03/17/06 (10)
- Re: Well why buy the magazine then? Nobody is forcing you to read it... - jdouglas51 06:59:52 03/18/06 (0)
- Let's take a British magazine as an example... - RGA 13:19:01 03/17/06 (3)
- This Chardonnay is fortunately too good to blow out my nose... . - John Marks 16:44:07 03/17/06 (1)
- Re: This Chardonnay is fortunately too good to blow out my nose... . - RGA 15:44:06 03/18/06 (0)
- Re: Let's take a British magazine as an example... - jdouglas51 13:53:33 03/17/06 (0)
- You guess wrong--and, the SA-8260 - John Marks 09:37:50 03/17/06 (4)
- Thank you ... - bjh 12:27:12 03/17/06 (1)
- A tough call - John Marks 17:00:15 03/17/06 (0)
- Re: You guess wrong--and, the SA-8260 - jdouglas51 11:32:21 03/17/06 (1)
- I am touchy, when people imply I am corrupt. - John Marks 17:11:11 03/17/06 (0)
Follow Ups
- Re: Let's take a British magazine as an example... - jdouglas51 13:53:33 03/17/06 (0)