In Reply to: Re: "Not reviewed in too long a time" is utterly disingenuous. posted by Bruce from DC on March 17, 2006 at 07:28:27:
I quite agree if something is listed as class A or class B in the stereophile list. The "expiration date" is more problematic for budget components. It's not surprising that most budget components don't last, since they are not part of reviewers reference systems. Since budget components on't get sent around again for review (and I would guess it would be pretty hard to get a reviewer to re-review a budget component that had not changed) such products will necesarily get dropped.
Perhaps an additional section containing budget components of merit?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "Not reviewed in too long a time" is utterly disingenuous. - John N 12:53:23 03/17/06 (2)
- Re: "Not reviewed in too long a time" is utterly disingenuous. - Bruce from DC 15:21:44 03/17/06 (1)
- Re: "Not reviewed in too long a time" is utterly disingenuous. - John N 22:11:15 03/17/06 (0)