|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: letter from Roger Sanders posted by reverendclark on December 7, 2004 at 14:27:16:
What strikes me as odd: I just feel that it's unjust that Gary usurped Roger's 49% without just compensation. If Gary's argument is that he infused so much money (which is why they became partners in the 1st place, lest we forget that was to be his contribution for the partnership) so as to "dilute" Roger's property (because Gary probably invested/spent more than he had planned on his own plans resulting from his own decrees), why be suddenly stingy when dealing with your supposed partner? Couldn't Gary just finish buying Roger out at the agreed upon rate? Isn't it bad enough to be evicted? I figure it's the least one could do for essentially renigging on the initial agreement. Now, if it was Roger's fault that Gary spent more than he planned, I could see an argument but it sounds as if Gary had the purse at all times.Am I wrong?
♪ moderate Mart £ ♫ ☺ Planar Asylum
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I thank you for your pains - Mart 15:12:05 12/07/04 (1)
- Re: I thank you for your pains - tecnfossil 08:49:59 12/08/04 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
