In Reply to: Re: why? bad precedent for an authorized dealer & 3rd party non-agent posted by jlh996 on April 22, 2002 at 14:19:54:
It's reprocussions aren't over once this transaction is. Should M'pan rectify all 3rd-party transactions with unauthorized dealers that they unknowingly hadn't disparaged? Or can you argue that it should be only with businesses for whom they are customers? Precedent's are an ugly can of worms. Do they replace used speakers that were perportedly damaged in transit too? Where does this new precedent stop? We can't argue that it's a one shot deal. That would be prejudicial & inadmissable in future court caes. We're making what amounts to be law here. Caution is not only warrented, it's crucial.
» moderate Mart £ « Planar Asylum
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- that's what precedent means - Mart 21:05:49 04/22/02 (0)