In Reply to: RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow posted by Davey on March 24, 2008 at 08:08:18:
I think part of the problem here is the premise that opinions are invalid if a person hasn't had first hand experience (listened) to the speaker. That's the easy way out of any discussion.>>>
Dave, I think it's possible to discuss ANYTHING without 1st hand experience, but in the end it's of little value beyond entertainment. The sum of the parts is impossible to know in this case.
If Peter Gunn's mods make the panel more rigid it WILL add to the bass quality and perhaps even quantity as perceived. That's hardly a wild statement. Stand changes to my many speakers over the years had tremendous impact on bass.
So again, we have a guy making mods to a speaker. Owners love the mods. He worked hard to create them and agrees with his buyers about the results. And then we have people who have ZERO 1st hand knowledge who want to be critical? And Mr. Gunn shouldn't be defensive? I'm defensive about it and I don't even know Peter Gunn.
Years ago I bought a pair of Carver Amazing speakers. I told an audiophile friend about them and he practically got hysterical about the inherently poor aspects of the Carver design. He knew audio, but also heard some bad accounts. I quietly suggested that proper matching of electronics and the qualities of the room might be behind some of the bias he'd "heard" from others.
Well guess what...he flew into town months later and heard my Carvers sitting atop their DIY stands and couldn't fathom what he'd heard or believed about the design. He bought a pair.
Frankly, Peter Gunn can say his mods make the 1.6/QR's fly and write poetry. If you haven't heard them, or seen them fly, then you are talking out of your arse. I don't care what you think you know about audio because I've seen too many rules broken over the years.
Just show me some unhappy customers? Surely there must be a few?
Robert
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - TheGoodCaptain 08:33:30 03/24/08 (39)
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - Davey 08:53:31 03/24/08 (38)
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - TheGoodCaptain 09:32:21 03/24/08 (37)
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - Davey 10:01:53 03/24/08 (36)
- Dave...run while you can.... :) nt - jjcarr 10:07:14 03/24/08 (35)
- What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 10:08:42 03/24/08 (34)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - jjcarr 10:10:49 03/24/08 (33)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 10:22:33 03/24/08 (32)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 11:14:48 03/24/08 (31)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 11:29:36 03/24/08 (30)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Dawnrazor 11:36:47 03/24/08 (29)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Peter Gunn 13:03:43 03/24/08 (6)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 13:32:19 03/24/08 (4)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 13:36:20 03/24/08 (3)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 13:57:14 03/24/08 (2)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 14:33:20 03/24/08 (1)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 15:00:25 03/24/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - jjcarr 13:29:12 03/24/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 12:51:19 03/24/08 (21)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - MaggieLover 15:03:43 03/24/08 (20)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 15:30:29 03/24/08 (19)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 15:45:48 03/24/08 (18)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - MaggieLover 16:58:48 03/24/08 (5)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 18:33:06 03/24/08 (4)
- Wow... - Rod H. 18:24:23 03/28/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - MaggieLover 20:26:46 03/24/08 (2)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 21:00:03 03/24/08 (1)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - MaggieLover 22:00:20 03/24/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 16:06:35 03/24/08 (11)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Peter Gunn 16:58:07 03/24/08 (10)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 18:08:52 03/24/08 (3)
- fair square - Peter Gunn 07:25:43 03/26/08 (2)
- RE: fair square - MaggieLover 17:01:22 03/26/08 (0)
- RE: fair square - Davey 14:38:39 03/26/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Planar Owner 18:02:53 03/24/08 (5)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Peter Gunn 06:00:44 03/25/08 (1)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 06:34:53 03/25/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 05:58:19 03/25/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 18:38:59 03/24/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 18:36:48 03/24/08 (0)