![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
108.213.92.252
In Reply to: RE: Isn't He the Opamp Guy? posted by Triode_Kingdom on September 05, 2012 at 13:10:30
Find one thing you just don't like the look of (the schematic)
(of course, you never heard it, nor have I)
and then toss all prior or subsequent work because it must all be "junk"
Makes sense.
Follow Ups:
Of course I haven't heard it, nor do I want to. I've heard enough junk opamps to last two lifetimes. That's why I build with tubes.
"toss all prior or subsequent work"
Everything I quoted is currently on his site. The circuit uses his transformers and represents his best technology. He can't say enough good about it.
--------------------------
Buy Chinese. Bury freedom.
It's sad I must remind you that I never mentioned his A2 op amp driven 211 amp.
How you fixated on an unrelated "disappointment" in your view, and then tried to bootstrap it to my "report of his findings" on a completely different subject, I don't know, but if it pleases you to bicker, bitterly time after time, then fine.
"It's sad I must remind you that I never mentioned his A2 op amp driven 211 amp."
No sadder than reminding you that "credibility" can be thoroughly researched at the Free Dictionary. That's why I raised the issue. If you can't stand to have the credibility of your sources questioned, maybe you shouldn't quote them.
--------------------------
Buy Chinese. Bury freedom.
if you question the credibility of the source, that's appropriate.
But your method of dis-crediting returns us partially to the whole subjective objective issue. Plus what ever possibly could be gained
in your favor will be ignored for what you've convinced yourself as good reasons. Again, if this feels right and productive to you, then fine.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: