![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
140.99.98.4
In Reply to: RE: Now Morricab we've been here before! posted by morricab on March 05, 2010 at 02:00:36
but I'll never forget how you've told us your system sounds like "dog poop", your "no pain no gain" comments as well as how great your boombox sounds on some recordings (Bob Seger in particular) that are unlistenable on your main system.
Personally I think you are much more credible when try to defend your position instead of weaseling out of it as you have been doing lately. I mean really you are one of those guys who speak condescendingly of equipment that sounds good - remember your remarks about the worst kinds of equipment and pleasant sounds?
Maybe I should consider your shift in position a sincere one, not just lip service to avoid inevitable humilation (again!), and then I could say to myself a job well done.
Thanks Morricab you've made my day!
Follow Ups:
"but I'll never forget how you've told us your system sounds like "dog poop", your "no pain no gain" comments as well as how great your boombox sounds on some recordings (Bob Seger in particular) that are unlistenable on your main system."
All taken out of context and twisted to suit your purposes. Go on find the orignal posts! It will be clear that you twist to suit your own ends.
"
Maybe I should consider your shift in position a sincere one, not just lip service to avoid inevitable humilation (again!), and then I could say to myself a job well done.
"
My position is always clear and always consistent. Yours is never clear nor consistent. I would say you are the one coming out of these exchanges with egg on your face. Only you are too clueless to realize that pretty much everyone here disagrees with what you are saying (at least what they can understand from you convoluted texts).
"My position is always clear and always consistent. Yours is never clear nor consistent."
Sure your "no pain, no gain", good recording quality = good sound & bad recording quality = bad sound and, your system sounds like dog poop comments are quite clear. Not to mention your comments about Bob Seger sounding great on your boombox!
What's troubling is how you've gone all out to deny the significance of such comments - that's all you are doing now!
So no your position is not consistent. You've got no problem whatsoever demeaning someone who likes the sound of their system over a wide range of recording qualities with comments like it "sounds pleasant" or "sounds good on pop music". Yet when push comes to shove you chose to wimp out and whine about your comments being taken out of context!
What's clear is when it suits your purposes you you'll admit how crappy your system sounds when compared to a boombox yet when someone calls you out on such comments you cry FOUL. Waaaaa!
" Only you are too clueless to realize that pretty much everyone here disagrees with what you are saying
I don't think so but so what?
I have made comments that many bad recordings sound better on limited systems because the limited system hides many of the flaws with its own limited resolving power. I have never said otherwise. However; I never said that they all sound "like poop" on my main system I said that many don't sound so good but that they are still enjoyable musically. Again, your inability to separate the impression of SOUND quality from musical enjoyment leads to you taking what I have said and running it through the DonT filter, to get something entirely different from it. I have made it clear from the beginning that I am not talking about ALL bad recordings and that the situation is much more complex than your so-called "myth".
You have repeatedly tried again and again to twist meanings to suit your own purposes but everyone here sees that is your MO. So twist on!! I am done with you.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: