Propeller Head Plaza

I added four words to one sentence "(while I was witness)" -- how about editing your posts?

66.51.146.3

Richard BassNut Greene

In Reply to: RE: It is amazing that you think you can cover your butt by editing your old posts. posted by robert young on December 14, 2007 at 09:13:39

... so they start with:
"And in conclusion ..."

I didn't want golden ears to take one sentence out of context,
for their usual vicious junkyard dog character attacks,
so I added a clarifying phrase for those golden ears,
who are sloppy readers.
.
.
.

Richard BassNut Greene
"I know what I hear" is often an audio fantasyland

Follow Ups:

Yes, Richard, you changed completely meaning of the sentence in question. - robert young 05:20:01 12/17/07 (4)
Face it: you got caught.

If you would like your statements to have any credibility, I would suggest that you think about the importance of the qualifiers you don't seem to think are so unnecessary.

Pointing out that you were way off the mark with your absolutes is hardly a " vicious junkyard dog character attack." Frankly, I'm not interested in you, I'm interested in what you post.
- Take sentence out of context and then attack -- is that all you Golden Ears have to support your beliefs? - Richard BassNut Greene 08:23:18 12/17/07 (3)
  You know perfectly well pulling one sentence out of any post
  could confuse the intended meaning ... but at least my posts
  in total ... are not as confused as you are:
  "Frankly, I'm not interested in you,
  I'm interested in what you post."
  RG
  If you were really interested, you would not
  pull one sentence out of context and
  then attack it like a junkyard dog.
  All you ARE interested in is your
  desperate attempt to find ANYTHING incorrect
  in my posts, so pulling my sentence out of context
  and misinterpreting it ... is the best you
  lame Golden Ears can do?
  .
  .
  .
  .
  .
  .
  Richard BassNut Greene
  "I know what I hear" is often an audio fantasyland
  
  Edits: 12/17/07
  - Nobody's buying that line of BS, RG. - robert young 08:37:24 12/17/07 (2)
    Your deflection technique is transparent and pathetic. The more you try to wiggle out of this trap you set for yourself, the more damage you do.
    
    Better let this one go, and be more careful next time.
    - Sentence by sentence, I'll explain my original post , for the "slower" audiophiles ... - Richard BassNut Greene 09:07:03 12/17/07 (1)
      A logical explanation of my original post
      (excluding the four word explanation added later)
      that angered the junkyard dog Golden Ears.
      
      If this is 'over your head',
      I can add another post explaning
      the 'explanation post':
      
      I originally wrote:
      "(1) "Not once in my 40 years of auditioning components in audio stores in many states has a salesman made any attempt to measure SPLs and match A-B SPL's.
      
      RG
      I'm obviously speaking about my own experiences in audio stores
      .
      .
      "(2) Not once in any audiophile home outside of my own has any audiophile measured SPL's and matched A-B SPLs (other than for blind tests done with an audio club)."
      RG
      I'm obviously still speaking about my own experiences,
      but this time in homes rather than in audio stores
      .
      .
      "People I have asked reported that A-B matching was rare in their experience other than with speakers where one was obviously louder than the other, and even then without sound meter measurements."
      RG
      To find out if my experiences were unusual,
      I asked other audiophiles about their experiences in other homes,
      where I was not present,
      to find out if their in-home experiences
      were similar to mine.
      .
      .
      "I have no doubt that the tiny minority of audiophiles who publish reviews are much more likely to do A-B volume matching
      ... but I wonder if 100% do?"
      RG
      Since I have no experience with audio reviewers,
      I can only wonder about the percentage of them
      who bother with A-B volume matching.
      .
      .
      .
      So do I have to explain every sentence of every post to you?
      That would mean after every post I'll have to add an explanation for the "slower" audiophiles who take the "short bus" to school,
      ... and move their lips when reading.
      .
      .
      
      Richard BassNut Greene
      "I know what I hear" is often an audio fantasyland
      - "I'll have to add an explanation for the "slower" audiophiles who take the "short bus" to school" - robert young 09:38:46 12/17/07 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Sentence by sentence, I'll explain my original post , for the "slower" audiophiles ... posted by Richard BassNut Greene on December 17, 2007 at 09:07:03
        
        So what do you call that statement if not an attack? You keep burying yourself in hypocrisy. Maybe you should try to avoid the hyperbole and instead post your comments as personal opinions rather than the absolute facts you pretend them to be.
        
        Your backtracking is still pathetic, no matter how hard you try to reconfigure your position after the fact. Unfortunately for you, you can't go back and edit the hundreds of posts of yours that make similar audacious and unsupportable claims.

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Schiit Audio