![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
83.248.105.167
In Reply to: RE: Frankly, My dear... posted by bjh on September 14, 2007 at 10:55:46
Dahlin',
Maybe you are the visionary amongst us, but I don't see how there can possibly be a whole discussion thread going on to collectively criticize an article that apparently one (1) person has read. Look at the misinformation evident already.
You tell me, but that doesn't seem like living up to the exacting standards those same critics' expect of scientific rigor, does it. Many of these critics aren't even believers in science or show much of a scientific worldview in the first place, so why do they care. As such it would be quite comical, even, were it not for the fact that the attitude is so widespread.
My point above, too.
TL
Follow Ups:
In fact it would have been better than the foolishness you offered.
Perhaps your position is something like... Shoddy science is better than no science or something similar. I really don't know but for those that have any proper conception of science their motto would surely be... Shoddy science is worst than no science at all.
Anyway, you go back to sparring with CJ if that's what turns you on but please refrain from comments on science if you please.
Thanks in advance
ps. Sweetie allow me to give you a little hint, don't hit Clark with "I thought you are a reviewer" because he's certain to counter telling you that he *isn't* a reviewer and very likely point you to his Reasons I'm Not A Reviewer (or whatever it's actually called) article. Ever hear the expression "Know thine adversary"?
ta-ta
We hope our perceptions ain't slippin
But we swear to God we seen Lou Reed
Cow tippin
In fact I would have preferred to speak of things like "reason" and "rationality" instead, but I wasn't sure if the terms would be familiar enough. Point proven.But you can also think of these issues in terms of consistency or intellectual honesty, if you know what I'm talking about.
Does that help?
Are you saying that clarkjohnsen "*isn't* a reviewer" in the same way he "prefers not to" publish anything?
So many pieces of advise in one message - that's so sweet of you! But don't you fear it might seem a bit sissy to be so nice to others?
TL
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: