![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
128.114.22.181
In Reply to: RE: I was asking a much simpler question. posted by Todd Krieger on September 11, 2007 at 19:50:42
I am not claiming that I have dug up a flaw in the SACD format. Just the opposite! I am simply saying that SACD is better than RBCD as revealed by the fact I can make a very good, compelling RBCD copy of the analog signal coming out of a RBCD player, but a RBCD copy of an analog signal derived from a SACD doesn't do it justice. SACDs are better. There is something advantagous to the higher sampling rate and/or more bits of SACD that comes through in the analog signal. This thread started by citing a study claiming the opposite.
Joe
Follow Ups:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: