![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.1.120.29
In Reply to: RE: No one is advocating mediocre performances - there are heaps of excellent modern interpretations .... posted by John C. - Aussie on December 10, 2011 at 15:56:41
There's no other like Richter today as I can see.His story telling transcends crappy recording.
Then again, I get a kick out of Paderewski's record even. ( here's 'nother pianist who had that special something )
Edits: 12/10/11Follow Ups:
The only two recent pianists I like better than Sokolov are Stephen Hough and Ayako Uehara...............
![]()
![]()
Any Schubert or Beethoven pieces you can recommend by him?
Or can you recommend me the piece you think he's on par with Richter.
Thanks!
I see that a new Sokolov Complete Recordings Box Set was just released last month.
I'll give it a shot.
A little excerpt from YouTube:
it should give me a good cross section of what he does.
Along with Schubert's No.21, It also contains Prokofiev's No.8 & 9 which I can compared to Richter. ( '61 DG Stereo & '58 Monitor Mono LPs)
Call me crazy but I am not a big fan of DVD watching of concerts. I enjoy biography and what not but all that visual stuff distracts me from actually listening to the contents.
I think YouTube is cool just to sample some new music but watching above segment, all I could think of was 'Ginsu Knife~'.
Anyways, looking forward to Sokolov vs Richter. :)
Sokolov has a double CD set of the Schubert G-major and B-flat-major Sonatas - yes, I think the B-flat is comparable to Richter's.
He's got several Beethoven Sonatas too - all of them comparable to Richter's. His recording of the Diabelli Variations is a bit more problematical - it doesn't hit its stride until he's about a third of the way through. He has a recording of the Hammerklavier (I'd guess it's hard to find these days) which features a rather slow tempo for the final fugue - but his articulation of the subject is very detached, which keeps up the liveliness and injects air into the textures. Like Richter, Sokolov is often a very original thinker, even if you don't always like what he comes up with.
I agree with Todd's recommendation of the Chopin Etudes Op. 25. I've heard no better performance of this complete set - recorded in concert BTW.
"Or can you recommend me the piece you think he's on par with Richter."
Chopin Etudes Op. 25........... Richter was great, but Sokolov was great too...............
![]()
![]()
Richter is maybe the best example to demonstrate how one could listen through a bad analog recording and still hear a great performance, where a bad digital recording (or digitization of a bad analog recording) would make him think he's listening to a "mediocre" performance...........Another example of this is George Szell.............
Edits: 12/10/11
I love many of his performance in spite crappy RCA records.
He also had a strong style as Szell ( albeit different ) in that it really doesn't matter if all of audiophile trimmings are not there as stylistic charms still come through.
**
Enjoying over 8000 CDs via Sennheiser HD800 headphones & a NuForce DAC9 on a Meridian Sooloos system
"Richter had more talent in his smallest fart than Lang Lang and Kissin have in their entire body."
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: