Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
136.35.184.24
In Reply to: RE: "Image density" posted by E-Stat on August 16, 2024 at 18:05:10
'haven't heard that term before'
Nor have I. What does that mean?
'What I strive for is utter see-through.'
As do I.
'Just like what I hear with live, unamplified instruments. At the concert hall.'
Yep. Just as HP outlined decades ago. The reference is real instruments, in real space, unamplified. That has always been and always will be my reference. If a system can do that well it will do well with any kind of music.
While we are certainly a long way from achieving that goal it is still the goal to attain. It is not the destination that counts it is the journey, the path. The reference of 'I like it therefore it is good' simply results in tale chasing.
I'm afraid that far too many audiophiles have little if any exposure to the real thing.
Of course everyone is free to make their own decision choose their own reference.
Follow Ups:
My best guess as to his definition of "image density" would be a kind of sense of palpability and substance to the sound image. And yes, all else being equal, dynamic drivers probably do, in fact, do this best, but with other significant compromises, as the poster pointed out.
Mark in NC
"The thought that life could be better is woven indelibly into our hearts and our brains" -Paul Simon
'sense of palpability and substance to the sound image'
If that is the definition then I don't buy into the argument that dynamics do it better than an electrostatic. I don't think they do. The original QUAD is nearly holographic in this regard I have yet to hear any speaker that does this sort of thing better. It is especially good with vocals they seem to be floating right in front of me. The ESL-63 gives one the most well defined soundstage I have yet to hear with rock solid images on the soundstage. Not quite as holographic as the original.
Larger panel electrostatics give a better sense of scale a bigger sound field with some loss of soundstage articulation and image precision. Not much.
'Image Density'? Sounds like more useless audiophile jargon to these ears.
This term makes total sense to me, but like you, I don't believe that it's a downside to planar speakers generally.
I found certain versions of ML speakers a long while ago seemed to have no "meat on the bones", a certain hollow sound, and so images lacked weight and substance. I never felt this about KLH9s, Quads, or any of the SoundLabs models. I also don't hear this on any of the Magnepans I have owned - T-1Ds, 3.5s, and 3.6s. Maggies have their own problems of course (most of them can corrected with substantial modifications).
And yes, all else being equal, dynamic drivers probably do, in fact, do this best...
all the best microphones from Schoeps, Neumann, etc. are condensers!
The physics of microphones generally aren't fully comparable to that of speakers. If not apples and oranges, then at least oranges and grapefruit.
Mark in NC
"The thought that life could be better is woven indelibly into our hearts and our brains" -Paul Simon
the objectives of transparency and coherence are.
Edits: 08/17/24
their introduction in 1916 predates the use of moving coils types. ;)
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: