Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
107.4.171.8
In Reply to: RE: Yeah, apples and oranges posted by johnvb on October 07, 2015 at 04:44:16
"The LS50s do best in small rooms. Driven too hard / loud (to fill up a larger room), and they can distort or sound thin."
It was a very big room, and as I mentioned a Marantz frontend and the stands are were too high... We did not push them hard at all...I did say they were "good"
"A better comparison would be against the MiniMags."
Three things here...I have heard the Mini-Maggies twice...both times they seemed very disconnected from DWM and not very good at all...
The Mini-Maggies are marketed as a desk top "system" the KEF LS 50's are not...
My biggest comparison was base on the SAME MSRP and IMHO .7's were a better value...
"the Kefs would most certainly be more dynamic. Then there is the whole mono vs dipole thing, so the listener will be bias as to what they prefer.
Because I have not heard the KEF's OTHER THAN AT A DEALERS and the .7's the same both without stellar frontends...in my head YES the LS 50's "should" be more dynamic...
YES, I am absolutely bias for the di-pole presentation...
"I always get a kick out of how, thanks to all the "glowing reviews" and "class A recommendation", the little LS50s have a big target on their back. I bet KEF has sold a boatload of them though :)"
Guilty as charged...I had BIG expectations because of ALL the glowing reviews...agree again BIG target on their back...
The salesman said they ARE their best selling speaker and 20 something vinyl crowd was buying the heck out of them and the only speaker they stock...every other speaker has to be ordered...
I really liked the LS 50's, but preferred the .7's...that's all...I am a Maggie guy...so totally get...
As with any really good resolving speaker, "you are what you eat", so a better frontend or tubes with the LS 50's I can imagine in small room would sound very good...both the .7's and LS 50's would benefit from a good sub...
So YES...apples and oranges...but based on MSRP, and the right room to handle .7's, that is the route "I" would go for all the above reasons...
In this totally SUBJECTIVE hobby and it is difficult to get two Audiophiles to agree on the time of day...hey, that's why they make Fords and Chevy's...
The 1.7i's really blew me away for the $2200...to the point I felt I could compare them to a $20,000 demo pair of KEF Blades...the Blades were awesome, but NOT 10 times more awesome than the 1.7i's based on price...
I am an extremely CHEAP audiophile, but also felt my 3.7i's, Sanders Magtech and CJ CT-5 Pre sound better than the Blades, other than the deep Bass...the Blades had $20,000+ Bryston front end...My CJ and Magtech...USED were $7200...
So, johnv as I respect your opinion and can see allot of potential in the LS 50's...they are just not for me...
Thank you for your input...
Mark
Follow Ups:
Sounds like the Mini Maggies were poorly set up. Phasing between DWM and the satellites is critical and as with all planars, they need space to breathe. I heard them right after hearing the 3.7's and they were comparable, which is to say spectacular -- it's hard to believe that that sound is coming from two little speakers. This was nearfield listening, though, as desktop speakers. When I moved back a few feet from the desk, they were still good, but lost some of their big-speaker-in-a-tiny-package magic.
Not comparing them to the LS-50's, which I haven't heard, just pointing out that you appear to have heard them under poor conditions.
The first place was in KC up to Rotel intergraded fed off an I-pod with AIFF files...it was a desk set-up and DWM was under the desk and just boomed...no tone or connection to the mains...they mains sounded really nice...
The second place I have heard them on 3 different occasions was the Magnepan Production office...same set up with a Wadia (sp?) and a I believe a Philips CD player...Once again the DWM was under the desk and just boomed and sounded very disconnected...
Now Shelia in customer service used them in an HT set-up with two DWM's and said they sounded very good...
I do not doubt set-up properly they could sound really good, as I said the mains sound good, but the DWM was under a desk both times and just boomed...so I am only saying this has been MY personal experience with the Mini's system...
The LS 50's being the same price as the .7's that was my bench mark for comparison...I much preferred the ,7's, but as a Maggie guy...I have a bias towards di-pole presentation...
thanks for chiming in Josh...good to hear from you...
Thanks
Mark
Hey, Mark!
Funny, we both heard them at Magnepan but the one's I heard were in Mark Winey's office with, IIRC, dual DWM's. I don't remember any boominess or sense of disconnection. Mark's desk faced out into the room whereas as I recall Sheila's faces the wall, that could have something to do with it.
By chance, I just read Steve Guttenberg's review of the .7's, and like you, he seems to prefer the .7's to the LS50's:
"Of course, some folks can't live with large panel speakers, and they will be happier with a small, high-end stand mount monitor speaker like the KEF LS50. It's terrific, but it sounds awfully small after you hear the Magnepan .7. The SVS Prime tower speakers sound bigger than the LS50, but the Primes are still no match for the .7 for producing closer to life-size music in your living room."
http://www.cnet.com/news/new-sensations-the-radically-different-magnepan-7-speakers/
You obviously have more Juice than I do...I did not make it into Mark Winey's office...
Yes, Shelia's desk is up against the wall...and the place in KC where I heard them was the same scenario...so not letting DWM's do their thing...
The 3 times I have been to the Maggie factory have all been great experiences...Lots of MN "NICE" floating around there, hard working Midwesterners with extreme pride in the work they do...lots of hands on go into every pair of Maggies...Good peeps making great speakers...
And they still survived without a Stereophile reviews and measurements...go figure... ;)
thanks Josh
Mark
Here's the arrangement in Mark's office. Of course, it helps to have the designer seated next to them, they're on their best behavior!
![]()
Like I said Josh...you have allot more juice than I do...great pic...
Who is currently the chief designer and came up with the .7 series using QR for the base and series crossover? Is it Mark?
Thanks
Mark
Alas, the one condition on my visit was that the design process was off limits -- otherwise I had the run of the place. I would have loved to see the R&D lab!
I do know though that the foil quasi ribbon was what Jim had originally wanted to use on the Maggies, and that they had used wire instead because of manufacturing practicality -- it's easier and cheaper to apply the wire. IIRC, they'd also had a model with a series crossover, and I read somewhere that Mark had wanted to eliminate the external crossover box -- he told me that most customers these days are less interested in bi amping and crossovers, which makes sense considering the availability of decent-sounding high powered amps -- bi amping still sounds better of course, but less better than it did in the days of the D-76.
I was wondering who the Chief design is and/or how many engineers on staff???
I do get, getting rid of the outboard factory passive x-overs...and since this tweaking Maggie board at times and how much people like to "upgrade" their Maggies...when they changed to the series x-over, I remember this board and all the sky is falling posts...But we have Neo, doing surgery on the 3.7i's, now...so it begins...
It does not surprise me they did not let a guy like you in the R&D lab...
(that is a complement, by the way, because you would "know" what you are seeing...unlike a guy like me that would just say..."cool")
thanks for sharing...to their credit, the end results speak for themselves...
Mark
I do know that they're big enough to have a specialized engineering staff, e.g., production engineer, QC engineer, etc. And of course Mark and Jim are engineers themselves. While I didn't get to witness the R&D effort, when I was there I was impressed by how everyone worked together. It seemed a very collegial atmosphere and they're used to working as a team.
While he couldn't show me current products, Wendell did offer to show me some of the projects they've worked on in the past. I would have loved to see them, but we ran out of time. I did see by chance a bunch of prototype Mini Maggie baffles of all shapes and sizes. It gives you an idea of how much tweaking and experimentation goes on to produce the sound we take for granted.
It's encouraging that the 20 something crowd is buying anything audiophile related...maybe there's hope for the hobby yet.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: