![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
72.253.179.5
In Reply to: RE: Houston, we have a problem. Geoff evades actual issue in post, red herrings his way to nowhereland posted by Elizabeth on May 25, 2011 at 06:39:44
assertions GK states, most of modern physics would be dead. Feynman;'s excellent lectures on QED would be totally worthless and not even taught in today's physics classes and all the Wikipedia entries would be obliterated. That they are not, speaks volumes as to the verification and assertions of GK.
What GK forgets is that the fields generated are instantaneous in their extent. That is part of the theory. It is funny to see him quoting "quantum" theory and still claiming Sheldrake's Morphic resonances as an explanation as well as claiming that his digital clock has mastered the dimension of time. Such contradictions. Seems like he has to put his ideas in many boats because he can't find an adequate explanation for his "theories" in just one. Just look at his back pedaling about the piezo effect. It is simply not worth the effort to straighten his thinking out.
Stu
PS: incidentally he forgot that the speed of light itself is not constant. It changes dependiong on the material it is in: hence our use of lenses.
Follow Ups:
GK only has a BS. So much for his loud proclamation of being a "theoretical physicist". By his standards, there are a hell of a lot of theoretical physicists walking about.
Stu
But there are less theoretical physicists walking around than steelworkers with high school GEDs.
There you go again, name dropping. Why, it's almost as if by uttering the name Feynman you suddenly know something about quantum mechanics. What name's next - Einstein? Lot of laughs!
Edits: 05/25/11 05/25/11 05/25/11
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: