![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
174.131.166.128
In Reply to: RE: Late 90's did the small driver large baffle, RadioShack FE102 ? posted by Edp on April 10, 2024 at 15:33:45
No need to wait, a lens is easy to explain if one thinks in terms of time.
Imagine a convex lens (thick at the center, thin at the edges), the velocity of light in the glass is slightly less than in air and so if one imagines a flat plane of photons entering the glass (an optical plane wave) , the thicker the glass, the greater that photon is delayed relative to the outer edges.
The light that exits the glass that entered as a flat plane is now a converging wavefront (coming to a focal point) with the "F" number being the ratio of the diameter to focal length..
With Sound on the other hand the velocity of sound in air only changes with temperature so using different materials to cause a delay is out but one can use a longer / shorter path lengths for that purpose.
Consider the potato masher lens or a slanted plate lens. Both of these deal with a horn that has a very narrow pattern up high, the lens progressively delays the edges vs the center and this produces a more curved wavefront (wider dispersion angle) at the exit.
The Paraline is a reversed situation the driver radiation is radial 360 degrees but easier to imagine if one had say 20 equal length tubes attached to the driver exit who's exit ends are lined up in the straight line. This way the sound radiates from all the tubes at the same instant and arranged in a "line". Now, imagine that there are no tubes and it is the equal distribution of pressure that causes the distribution.
Hope that helps.
Tom
Follow Ups:
Appreciate the insight and explanation of the mechanisms involved.
Until you mentioned it I didn't think of horn lens like the JBL Hartsfield (2390 ?) relating to the examples of a lens applied to a direct radiator. Helps with grasping with mechanisms involved.
In his last few years Brian Cheney of VMPS was committing a number of his line source units with a lens. I never fully understood the mechanism he was working on, but the units he applied this method definitely "worked" as there was a difference with over without lens
![]()
Left no lens. Right with lens
In the link added for Graham Audio, I'm not sure, but it appears the vintage approach of slotting bass units is more of a directivity influence than what you describe for the lens
It's always an eye opener when I'm confronted with a design that "violates conventional guidelines" but actually works better.Possibly one day I'll stumble into an audio room and the Paraline can perform its eye opener. Did that with the Unity way back machine.
Edits: 04/12/24
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: