![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
27.33.87.80
In Reply to: RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable posted by DexysMidnightRunner on March 16, 2014 at 05:39:13
I can understand why most people who do an actual trial think there is no difference between HDMI cables for video quality.
When I first got my high end Sony backlit LED TV, ISF calibrated and so on, I purchased a series of expensive HDMI cables from Nordost, QED, Chord Company and others, and I really could barely tell a difference between them on video quality.
It was only until I purchased a Mapleshade Vivlink Plus HDMI that I first experienced a video quality improvement, and noticeably. But the Vivlink is a fragile construction bordering on the ridiculous (like all of Mapleshades products), and very susceptible to noise related issues from whatever it touches.
So I have always wondered how the latest Wireworld Platinum Starlight compares. Its good to hear reports of Video improvement from the Ultraviolet, a very affordable cable indeed relative to speciality cables.
Follow Ups:
I use the WireWorld Silver Starlight 5.2 HDMI. Killer performance, only bettered by, the Platinum version. It will not matter if the cable is current platinum or not, it is still a platinum version HDMI.
This HDMI cable REALLY does improve the picture...let's keep it top secret !!
Let's let people on these forums keep on saying that.. "all HDMI cables are the same"...HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA ....
Right On!
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: