![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
99.102.193.46
My own thinking on the old problem of "digital sound" is that it is largely a function of the non-mechanical nature of digital. Instead of being able to calculate a smooth transmission of sound from groove to speaker, digital sources begin with a kind of non-analogue "black box" that, for want of a better description, simply "chatters away" and forces the user to figure out how to make it part of a smooth sounding musical chain. It is kind of like trying to compensate for a microphonic tube, humming transformer, or overly sensitive turntable: all you want is for things to quiet down, so you can get a smooth signal chain going.
But digital never lets up. Sometimes, you just have to throw your hands up and realize, there is no "smoothing" out digital, because, quite simply, it is *not analogue*. The best you can do, is realize what exactly the problem is with the digital chatter and noise that plague our digital front ends, and then try to tackle it head on the best you can.
One aspect of digital sound that has always struck me, is that it is always "in your face," it never lets up -- just like the aforementioned chatter box (some of us are married to one too!). So, how to make it so that the digital "black box" mellows out, stops "yammering" in the signal chain and instead becomes part of a smoother overall chain of music transmission?
I was experimenting, and I think I may be on to something. Several months ago, I reversed the directionality on my speaker cables. A lot of people do not believe in cable directionality, but to me it is just common sense. I noticed, that with the directional arrows on my harmonic tech pro-11's pointing *away* from the speakers, that I was getting a more coherent, smoother sound. It was as if the system had "simmered down" a notch, and relaxed.
My thinking is, that by slightly "stifling" the music chain somewhat, this reversing of cable directionality in fact counterbalances the "chatter box" quality of digital replay. In order to test this out, I noticed that when playing back vinyl, the system sounded *too* laid back with the directionality reversed.
I experimented as well with reversing the directionality of interconnects, but found that too much of a good thing tended to "shut in" the music too much; after all, we are talking about counterbalancing a chattering, not a yelling!
Anyway, this might be something to experiment with. Using the reversability of cable directionality to offset the non-smooth digital chatter that seems to never know when enough is enough!
optimally proportioned triangles are our friends
Follow Ups:
One very overlooked factor is the error correction circuit. You often hear mention of it but rarely see any manufacturer or engineer addressing the issue. Early on there was a lot written that the more the error correction needed the worse the sound.
That is definitely true, but no where do you see super regulated supplies for the EC circuit, nor do your see fast acting devices being used to trigger things like the focus motors on the laser transport.
In my experimentation, I have simply added a bit of ferro fluid to the focus motor coils (not recommended for the novice!). The ferro fluid speeds up the motor action and you hear, immediately, greater dynamics and a lower noise floor with greater detail, of course. I normally use the Sony type transports and it is imperative that you add equal amounts of the ferro fluid to each side of the motor coils other wise the sensors go crazy and are unable to focus the lens at all.
I believe it is imperative that we move closer to the source of problems, rather than applying band aid fixes.
Stu
Please feel free to make more references to our website in your title.
I agree that most wire and cable-related things are directional. In one direction the sound is smooth, warm, and laid back. In the other it is edgy and in-your-face.
The arrows on your speaker cables were placed according to the tastes and compensating distortions in the designers' systems. Neither direction character is correct in an absolute sense, it is just that in many systems one direction will give overall better sound because of other problems in the system.
Digital seems to give many people trouble because the equipment is sensitive to RF noise. I've finally tamed the nastiness in my Wadia 861 after 12 years by putting multiple kilograms of damped crystals above and below it. The sound is now superb and better than any analog setup I've heard. Controlling RF noise takes a lot of work, but the results are worthwhile if you have a sizable CD collection.
Al:
I'm about ready to pull the trigger on buying bulk crystals. Do you recommend certain types? Thanks in advance.
ET
:)
Al,
I have an 861se and wondering how you went about damping it. You may respond by private email if you wish.
Willis
:)
I think you should try one of these with a Power Wrap.
See link:
![]()
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: