let's discuss this off-list ! - dice45

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Why the SME V is no longer in Recommended Components? - proufo 21:20:10 12/10/01 (46)

Re: Why the SME V is no longer in Recommended Components? - ishmael 19:23:08 12/11/01 (1)

No mystery - edb15 21:20:46 12/11/01 (0)

Why is everybody getting so tizzy about this? - Penguin 18:31:08 12/11/01 (2)

Me not ... :-) - dice45 05:26:09 12/14/01 (1)

I am glad... - Pernguin 14:28:23 12/16/01 (0)

HiFi Magazines - JR 09:38:28 12/11/01 (0)

For the same reason BBC LS3/5a was once classified D (!) (nt) - Simply Sam 09:05:44 12/11/01 (0)

Why do you care? - Lew 06:47:32 12/11/01 (0)

answer to your question - Bruce from DC 06:40:04 12/11/01 (1)

Hello Bruce and many thanks!! (nt) - proufo 14:34:42 12/11/01 (0)

Re: Why the SME V is no longer in Recommended Components? - J.A.S. 06:26:53 12/11/01 (1)

Re: Why the SME V is no longer in Recommended Components? - Eric Chan 05:53:32 12/12/01 (0)

Re: Why the SME V is no longer in Recommended Components? - proufo 05:49:35 12/11/01 (0)

It's still one of the best tonearms available - eclectic iconoclast 23:05:37 12/10/01 (0)

SMEV Design Failure - MK Lai 22:19:05 12/10/01 (30)

Re: Wait a second... - Klaus 02:01:58 12/11/01 (1)

Klaus, the answer to your prayer ? - JR 05:15:18 12/11/01 (0)

Re: SMEV Design Failure - Fisherman 23:45:26 12/10/01 (27)

Re: SMEV Design Failure - dice45 05:26:06 12/11/01 (26)

What is your design? - DrM 08:06:54 12/11/01 (1)

Re: What is your design? - dice45 08:43:26 12/11/01 (0)

SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - bkearns 06:38:01 12/11/01 (23)

Re: SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - dice45 08:18:57 12/11/01 (22)

Re: SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - John Elison 08:46:05 12/12/01 (2)

Re: SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - dice45 13:45:48 12/12/01 (1)

Re: SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - John Elison 19:11:12 12/12/01 (0)

Re: SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - bkearns 10:24:20 12/11/01 (18)

Re: SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - dice45 14:11:55 12/11/01 (17)

Re: SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - bkearns 02:23:51 12/12/01 (16)

Re: SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - dice45 04:09:44 12/12/01 (15)

Re: SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - Klaus 05:42:28 12/12/01 (14)

Re: SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - dice45 06:52:56 12/12/01 (13)

Re: SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - bkearns 08:56:19 12/12/01 (12)

SME V geometry: Brian is right! (lengthy lengthy) - dice45 20:34:58 12/13/01 (7)

Question to Brian: Difference between Baerwald and LÃ¶fgren alignment - dice45 05:36:03 12/14/01 (2)

Re: Question to Brian: Difference between Baerwald and LÃ¶fgren alignment - bkearns 08:16:01 12/14/01 (1)

Thanxalot! attached: my homebrew tonearm geometry calculus. - dice45 08:37:38 12/15/01 (0)

Wow! Great Job, Bernhard..... - John Elison 21:37:57 12/13/01 (3)

Re: Wow! Great Job, Bernhard..... - dice45 02:39:08 12/14/01 (2)

Re: Wow! Great Job, Bernhard..... - John Elison 06:26:32 12/14/01 (1)

... it is only part of a system philosophy - dice45 12:25:16 12/14/01 (0)

Re: SME V tonearm design: a success from the point of view of alignment - dice45 14:32:45 12/12/01 (3)

Whether you loathe my attitude is irrelevant â€“ NO PERSONAL ATTACKS PLEASE - bkearns 01:24:18 12/13/01 (0)

let's discuss this off-list ! - dice45 02:33:59 12/14/01 (1)

Re: let's discuss this off-list ! - bkearns 04:16:44 12/14/01 (0)

Re: Why the SME V is no longer in Recommended Components? - Hunter 21:40:42 12/10/01 (0)

Follow Ups

let's discuss this off-list ! - dice45 02:33:59 12/14/01 (1)

Re: let's discuss this off-list ! - bkearns 04:16:44 12/14/01 (0)