![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: OK so if all theories are welcome, here are mine. posted by bartc on April 8, 2011 at 15:08:08:
I actually agree with most of your theory. I also suspect the unique atomic structures of non-quartz crystals are what gives them their distinctive sonic characteristics.However, while it's true many crystals are piezo or pyro electric, I don't think those properties are the operating mechanisms for most audio applications. I suspect the operating mechanism has to do with the crystal's unique lattice structure you describe - and I suspect it's that symmetrical lattice structure that dictates how the Atoms themselves behave in the presence of mechanical/acoustic vibration or RFI/EMI. But this atomic behavior is different from the piezo effect a "macro effect," the physical crystal itself is deformed. These Atomic mechanism(s) can also explain why the sonic performance of crystals varies according to type, whereas the piezo theory, in my opinion, has quite a bit of difficulty accounting for the variation in sonic results.
Edits: 04/08/11
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: OK so if all theories are welcome, here are mine. - geoffkait 15:54:16 04/08/11 (23)
- It would help if your understanding of piezo phenom were clearer to the rest of us. - bartc 16:33:51 04/08/11 (22)
- RE: It would help if your understanding of piezo phenom were clearer to the rest of us. - geoffkait 16:58:20 04/08/11 (21)
- What Unclestu said (me too) plus - bartc 17:29:00 04/08/11 (18)
- RE: What Unclestu said (me too) plus - geoffkait 17:52:32 04/08/11 (17)
- Ah, but what about...... - Jon Risch 19:22:39 04/09/11 (12)
- RE: Ah, but what about...... - geoffkait 06:25:38 04/10/11 (11)
- excitation - unclestu 12:30:30 04/11/11 (10)
- Actually, you're wrong - geoffkait 13:06:45 04/11/11 (8)
- : Actually, you're wrong - unclestu 13:56:53 04/11/11 (7)
- RE: : Actually, you're wrong - geoffkait 14:07:12 04/11/11 (6)
- you're wrong - unclestu 16:48:15 04/11/11 (5)
- Sorry - geoffkait 17:05:34 04/11/11 (4)
- Well then - unclestu 17:54:37 04/11/11 (3)
- Question - geoffkait 18:21:31 04/11/11 (2)
- Aparently - unclestu 15:16:19 04/12/11 (1)
- The plot thickens - geoffkait 15:57:46 04/12/11 (0)
- I should - unclestu 12:32:14 04/11/11 (0)
- So here's what I've read. - Paul_A 04:53:20 04/09/11 (3)
- RE: So here's what I've read. - geoffkait 07:47:30 04/09/11 (2)
- I thought that you were going to enter into the discussion... - Paul_A 08:35:35 04/09/11 (1)
- You're kidding, right? - geoffkait 08:54:59 04/09/11 (0)
- It is quite - unclestu 17:18:06 04/08/11 (1)
- RE: It is quite - geoffkait 17:42:25 04/08/11 (0)