![]() |
Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
In Reply to: Re: VICTOR KHOMENKO:BEST 6SN7 TO REPLACE THE SOVTEKS IN THE VK-60 posted by Scott T. on February 24, 2000 at 08:20:24:
***I don't know how Sovteks can sound good in ANY hi-fi amp.Quite so. You don't know, indeed.
***Then again,
here is another perfect case of a company pushing a product(Sovteks)
simply because he wants to sell them to a customer.You must be in the state of delusional confusion. We are not in business of selling tubes.
***The real reason why manufacturers recommend Sovteks is because they are
readily availableNot a bad reason to start, don't you think so?
***and are real cheap for the manufacturers to get(marking them up dramatically).Confused again. We do not mark them up. We are not in business of selling tubes. When we sell tubes as spare parts, we charge our expenses. Many places ARE in tube selling business, please feel free to buy from them.
***If you buy Sovteks from BAT(or any other hi-end manufacturer
for that matter)they will charge you twice as much as you can buy them from
most tube places here on the net.The beauty of this market is that you DON'T have to buy tubes from high-end manufacturer. I would be happy to supply you with the list of tube vendors. However, it sounds like you would like the high end manufacturer to privide you with free service of procurement, testing, sorting and shipping tubes to you at no change? I can assure you that this is not going to happen soon.
Who's next on your target list? Mercedes Benz dealer? How dare they marking up their cars! I want that 600 at cost too.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Hmmm - Victor Khomenko 08:47:51 02/24/00 (65)
- please don't take offence, BUT....... - Gangsta' 10:08:12 02/24/00 (57)
- None taken - Victor Khomenko 10:40:20 02/24/00 (56)
- Re: None taken - Jack G 13:37:55 02/24/00 (54)
- But Jack, you have to remeber that.... - Joe S 15:25:49 02/24/00 (28)
- Re: But Jack, you have to remeber that.... - Victor Khomenko 15:58:21 02/24/00 (14)
- Business 101 I get... - Joe S 16:06:13 02/24/00 (13)
- Dangers of insufficient knowledge - Victor Khomenko 05:35:54 02/25/00 (7)
- Then why not educate us all.... - Joe S 06:20:07 02/25/00 (6)
- A bit here - Victor Khomenko 06:38:27 02/25/00 (4)
- thank you - Joe S 06:56:12 02/25/00 (3)
- Handshake and RESET. (nt) - Victor Khomenko 07:22:00 02/25/00 (2)
- Perhaps moderators should clean up some of this mess. - Victor Khomenko 07:25:35 02/25/00 (1)
- Re: Perhaps moderators should clean up some of this mess. - Rod M 07:37:38 02/25/00 (0)
- Re: Then why not educate us all.... - Dave Derrick 06:36:37 02/25/00 (0)
- Re: Business 101 I get... - Victor Khomenko 16:22:37 02/24/00 (4)
- Re: Business 101 I get... - Joe S 18:36:50 02/24/00 (3)
- Re: Business 101 I get... - Victor Khomenko 19:16:07 02/24/00 (2)
- Sigh - Joe S 20:21:31 02/24/00 (1)
- You got the final word. - Victor Khomenko 20:26:07 02/24/00 (0)
- BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!(nt) - Jack G 15:32:37 02/24/00 (12)
- Yep... - Joe S 15:59:35 02/24/00 (11)
- Re: Yep... - Victor Khomenko 16:15:16 02/24/00 (10)
- Victor.... - Joe S 18:53:55 02/24/00 (9)
- Re: Sour grapes - Adrian 22:25:55 02/24/00 (6)
- Re: Sour grapes - Joe S 06:08:13 02/25/00 (5)
- Maybe not... plus limited knowledge smear. - Victor Khomenko 06:21:21 02/25/00 (3)
- Re: Maybe not... plus limited knowledge smear. - Joe 07:05:31 02/25/00 (0)
- Come on guys...... - Rod M 07:02:27 02/25/00 (1)
- Sorry for waking you up at THAT early hour... - Victor Khomenko 07:30:06 02/25/00 (0)
- Re: Sour grapes - Adrian 06:15:06 02/25/00 (0)
- Re: Victor.... - Victor Khomenko 19:28:49 02/24/00 (1)
- Joe, - Victor Khomenko 19:48:17 02/24/00 (0)
- Re: None taken - Victor Khomenko 15:23:56 02/24/00 (0)
- Here ya go... - Uncle Ned 14:07:31 02/24/00 (23)
- Wait a minute... - Jack G 15:05:17 02/24/00 (3)
- Re: Wait a minute... - Uncle Ned 20:11:14 02/24/00 (2)
- Which version did you get? - Victor Khomenko 20:17:40 02/24/00 (1)
- Re: Which version did you get? - Uncle Ned 21:35:41 02/24/00 (0)
- Re: Here ya go... - Jack G 14:57:56 02/24/00 (18)
- Re: Here ya go... - CJ 18:59:36 02/24/00 (17)
- A full moon - Jack G 19:10:51 02/24/00 (16)
- Re: A full moon - CJ 19:26:21 02/24/00 (15)
- Re: A full moon - Dave Derrick 06:08:38 02/25/00 (0)
- Chill :-) - Jack G 03:38:45 02/25/00 (1)
- I certainly hope so... (nt) - Victor Khomenko 09:12:36 02/25/00 (0)
- Re: A full moon - Rod M 20:12:28 02/24/00 (8)
- Re: A full moon - CJ 20:25:00 02/24/00 (7)
- Re: A full moon - Rod M 20:40:25 02/24/00 (6)
- Actually... - Rich 08:19:53 02/25/00 (2)
- Re: Actually... - Rod M 08:44:15 02/25/00 (1)
- LOL (nt) - Rich 09:13:35 02/25/00 (0)
- Re: A full moon - CJ 22:10:09 02/24/00 (2)
- Re: A full moon - Rod M 06:18:54 02/25/00 (0)
- Re: A full moon - Uncle Ned 01:19:59 02/25/00 (0)
- Re: A full moon - robert 19:37:30 02/24/00 (2)
- Re: A full moon - CJ 19:59:19 02/24/00 (0)
- No, it does not.... - Victor Khomenko 19:46:18 02/24/00 (0)
- now **I** stand corrected... thanks Victor!! (NT) - Gangsta' 11:22:44 02/24/00 (0)
- Re: Well....It Goes To Show That.... - Scott T. 09:37:08 02/24/00 (6)
- Re: Well....It Goes To Show That.... - Joe S 13:26:04 02/24/00 (2)
- Re: Well....It Goes To Show That.... - Rod M 20:16:59 02/24/00 (0)
- Re: Well....It Goes To Show That.... - Jack G 15:40:09 02/24/00 (0)
- Re: Well....It Goes To Show That.... - Joe 11:57:49 02/24/00 (2)
- Re: Well....It Goes To Show That.... - Joe 12:12:53 02/24/00 (1)
- Re: Well....It Goes To Show That.... - Scott T. 12:40:52 02/24/00 (0)