In Reply to: It's funny... posted by SE on May 7, 2002 at 11:02:44:
Well no but...Some where there is a famous Bruckner story that goes some thing like this:
When Bruckner was seeing Die Walkure for the first time he was in a trance overwhelmed by the Opera, near the end of the Opera Bruckner he was jostled out of his concentration and turned to a friend and asked "Why is that woman on that rock"
I am unlike Bruckner in many ways. One of them is that I do need to know, at least, the details of the story before enjoying the Opera - especially Wagner. I really wanted to listen to and learn Debussy's Pelleas, I had a weekend to myself so I went to the local (NYC) used record store, unfortunately they only had the Karajan version on EMI, OK expensive, but I wanted to get to work. I checked to make sure that it had a libretto and I was off, I neglected to check if the libretto was in English. An English company made a libretto in French/German only. I could not get past the first half of the first side, I was maddened by the mystery of what was going on. So back to Tristan.
The Ring remains one of my favorite works of Music, but one enriched by a general understanding of what is going on. The video, as mentioned, would be an excellent tool. For me the abstract music of the singing is heightened with even a general knowledge of the content of the text. A rough example, have you ever passed by two people having an argument in a foreign language only to realize, buy visual clues, that it is not a confrontation but a conversation. Without an idea of the verbal clues the possibility is much greater that Wagner will seem like bombast and growling.P.S. I am not an Opera listener by nature, but Wagner is different. Maybe start with Sigfried, it's the most fun
Gregg
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Did some one mention Bruckner? - gd 19:21:03 05/07/02 (0)