In Reply to: Info from Chris Own that I thought might help posted by RogerJ on August 31, 2003 at 14:33:52:
"Non-oversampling units will be quite insensitive to timing errors in the signal. Digital noise rejection with the dAck! is about the best you will find anywhere, which allows users to spend less on transports and expensive cables (and filters)"
The difference between a cheap transport and an older expensive transport is as clear as day with my own 'non-oversampling' DAC so any 'digital noise rejection (???)' may apply to his own design rather than non-oversampling in general.
Best Regards,
Chris redmond.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Definately don't agree with one comment of his. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 11:00:23 09/01/03 (4)
- Definitely don't agree with one comment of his. - csown 20:43:58 09/01/03 (3)
- Re: Definitely don't agree with one comment of his. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:56:56 09/02/03 (1)
- Re: Definitely don't agree with one comment of his. - csown 12:05:25 09/02/03 (0)
- Re: Definitely don't agree with one comment of his. - Todd Krieger 23:31:33 09/01/03 (0)