In Reply to: Think about being more responsible... posted by Ted Smith on July 11, 2007 at 08:11:40:
"The point is that you said 'Even this page has some technically bogus info..... Dither doesn't apply to D/A conversion, and such techniques are not even possible at -144 dB. The 'effective resolution' is determined by the media and A/D dither applied to the recording, not the D/A conversion.' and that is entirely false and misleading."
Anybody can conveniently claim that a statement is entirely false and misleading. And claim someone isn't responsible. But it's dangerous if done so without an explanation why.
"It's false that it's bogus,"
You *think* it's false..... I've demonstrated that it's true, and I'd be happy to do so again. This isn't rocket science.
"it's false that dither is inapplicable in D/A"
But it is inapplicable in D/A..... The only time it is applicable is in A/D conversion or when resolution (not interpolation precision) is lost in bit truncation.
"it's false that it's not possible at -144 dB."
It's not possible in the context of enhancing the signal. The ambient noise before an A/D would drown it out. (It would in essence be "self-dither.")
"You didn't understand the context of the statement and publicly accused people of 'technically bogus info' when in fact the info was correct."
If you think it's correct, state why.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Think about being more responsible... - Todd Krieger 08:49:46 07/11/07 (1)
- RE: Think about being more responsible... - Ted Smith 09:58:44 07/11/07 (0)