Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share youe ideas and experiences.
Return to K&K Audio / Lundahl Transformers
152.163.100.7
In Reply to: Anyone compare the DAC with a bigger size Transformer ? (nt) posted by akltam on December 27, 2004 at 02:45:03:
You mean output transformer?
Kevin Carter
K&K Audio
www.kandkaudio.com
![]()
Follow Ups:
.
![]()
Hi Akltam,The power supply provided for use with the passive output uses a small Telma transformer. The power supply for use with the active output uses a much larger Lundahl LL1683.
I have used both power supplies in combinations with both the active and passive outputs and the power supplies sound the same to me.
I first used battery, then tried a massive toroidal with LCRCRC filtering...can't say I heard an improvement. Then I tried something like this...http://www.tnt-audio.com/clinica/regulators2_impedance2_e.htmlwhich was the best sounding. I am now thinking of getting a smaller transformer since with the current source...what is the point?
To infinity and beyond!!!
![]()
I read the whole article referenced and found that I1 and I3 are used for simulation purposes and "are frequency-dependent current sources, forcing a current sweep of 1 Ampere from 1Hz up to 1MHz".
Very interesting that you prefer the shunt regulator 12V supply to the DAC, given the fact that the RAKK DAC seems to have several on-board regulators. I'm putting together a power supply (regulator) for my DAC right now and hope to gain from your experiments.I looked at the web page and hope you could help with it. I was not sure (first schematic) what was meant by I1 AC 1 0. In the enhanced schematic it was called I3 AC 1m0. Likewise the value of the resistor (R13) preceeding the C1 in first fig seems to be 70 meg, but surely then C1 has little effect. Any other advice will be welcome.
Vrystaaat!
Hi Francois,Here is my setup...sort of a scaled down version of the first diagram...
the I1 is your load...ie your dac or whatever..So here is what it looks like...really a text book circuit...
After the rectifier...and before I2 you have a cap (try different values and types for best sound)
then use a CCS such as LM1085 or the humble LT317 set for the current draw of your circuit plus 20-30mA extraThen set the TL431 for the voltage you need by the dividing network (see datasheet of the 431)
The cap c2 lowers impedance but posts over at diyaudio say it sounds worse than not having it in there...( i did not experiment and simply
left it out)after the tl431 simply find a cap that sounds good for you I have a 1500uF cap with a little 4,5uF to bypass...
and that is it reallyHaak Vrijstaat....Haak!!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: