In Reply to: Re: "Which knocks SACD into a cocked hat." posted by Neil Wilkes on August 25, 2004 at 10:52:22:
SACDs frequency response extends to 100kHz, 24 Bit 96kHz extends to 44kHz. SACD samples the signal 2,822,400 times per second 24 96kHz 96,000 times per second!Christine Tham has measured the high frequency noise between 20kHz - 50kHz to be 5%, that is 10 times less that LP in that range. In the supersonics I really don't think 5% of the signal being "noise" will even be audible.
Also the resolution of a PURE DSD recorded SACD is much higher than even 196kHz 24 Bit, all you have do is listen to one, it's really that simple.
And DVD-Audio even at 192kHz still has a PCM sound signature that CHANGES the sound. Anyone who is an engineer will clarify this for me but DSD was designed to be "transparent" with no sound of it own. Hundreds of tests have been done and DSD sound exactly like the live microphone feed, even Dolby S Analog sounds closer to microphone feed than even 192kHz 24 Bit PCM. The problem with DVD-Audio is it is still PCM, it is a better PCM but still PCM!!!!!
Where as SACD offers a sonic realism that was before only available with Analog tape at 30ips or LPs on the very best turntables. PCM cannot and will never be able to offer this degree of sonic realism, it is impossible. And it is unfair to ask PCM to perform in this matter.
Neil once you get to actually hear a PURE DSD recording SACD you will be singing a different tune.
And to compare SACD to CD PROVES You have NEVER heard a good SACD!
Anyone who has ever heard a correctly recorded and played SACD will accept nothing less
Pure simple logic,
Teresa
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Total bald-faced out right lies: I have owned both DVD-Audio and SACD. - Teresa 22:16:02 08/25/04 (19)
- Engineer Elliot Mazer says " I love the sound of DVD-A at 192/24 . Nothing sounds as good as that " . Mazer has ... - ZS KEKL 22:51:02 08/25/04 (18)
- Does DVD-A even offer a high-rez 2 channel layer? - jdaniel@jps.net 07:31:37 08/26/04 (1)
- DVD-A can - John Kotches 10:38:49 08/26/04 (0)
- The funy part is Mazer's quote does not say what you claim it says. - Duilawyer 06:32:32 08/26/04 (1)
- You are wrong . Mazer was asked to compare DVD-A vs. SACD . If you click on the link to Mazer's comments ... - ZS KEKL 09:41:25 08/26/04 (0)
- those are all commercial ROCK recordings I trust the ears of engineers that actually make realistic sounding recordings - Teresa 23:32:05 08/25/04 (13)
- Re: " Why did the labels choose SACD ? " . John Eargle says " Sony was generous " . It was nothing about the sound ... - ZS KEKL 00:25:54 08/26/04 (12)
- John Eargle still records all his projects DSD even though Sony's technical assistance & equipment loans ended 2 years - Teresa 02:40:36 08/26/04 (11)
- But probably just because he's used to it, - head_unit 15:20:21 09/18/04 (0)
- Blu-ray ? - RBP 10:39:25 08/26/04 (9)
- Can you post more details about those independent DVD-As? - Eric LeRouge 11:20:51 08/26/04 (8)
- Got it, thanks! -t- - RBP 12:52:25 08/26/04 (0)
- Eric, did you get my mail? Something bounced.. - RBP 12:44:28 08/26/04 (1)
- Yes I did, both messages, thanks - Eric LeRouge 12:49:51 08/26/04 (0)
- RE: - RBP 11:27:51 08/26/04 (4)
- Yep -- if there was a way to order them from a single source, we'd be interested to know . . . - Martin419 11:48:39 08/26/04 (2)
- Re: Yep -- if there was a way to order them from a single source, we'd be interested to know . . . - RBP 12:00:08 08/26/04 (1)
- OK. e-mail sent. {n.t.} - Martin419 12:32:30 08/26/04 (0)
- Re: RE: - Eric LeRouge 11:45:18 08/26/04 (0)