Home High Efficiency Speaker Asylum

Need speakers that can rock with just one watt? You found da place.

Re: Wave shape

Tom Danley wrote:

[about the issue discussed here]

>> I will ask Pat to forward me your e-mails you sent to the office
>> in case you still can't remember who threatened legal action to who.

This statement seems terribly childish to me. It's like a little boy trying to tattle that someone called them names and wanting them to go to bed without supper.

If I had threatened litigation, it seems imprudent to discuss the matter publically - Even to say that you shouldn't discuss it. That is if you really thought you were going to court. The only reason you might mention it is to attempt to gain some pity from those who read your posts.

Beyond this, you cannot claim to have misunderstood the letter and also say that your attorney read it. This would mean that not only you misunderstood, but also your legal counsel, boss and co-workers. That can leave only one reason for your position, and that is to deceive the public.

No one that has read the letter has interpreted it as you have claimed. So I do not believe that your boss, co-workers and attorney misinterpreted the letter as a legal threat either.

There was a threat made by one of your friends though. John Hancock was making some threats, and I replied to him encouraging him to do whatever he wanted to do. But this is not something that you could have possibly misinterpreted, because others have seen this exchange and would have undoubtedly corrected you if you misunderstood.

Again, I do not believe that your boss, co-workers and attorney could have misrepresented these letters. No one else had a hard time understanding what was being said, or who it was being said to. I do think you have a relationship with John Hancock, but that is a different matter entirely.

>> You are still suffering from a misconception about the basics here
>> and my explaining it yet another time to you will make no difference
>> to you as your various position on things always seems set in 9 bag
>> concrete.

No, Tom. It is not I that has a misconception and it is not for you to do any explaining. I think that the only reason you go to such lengths is to promote your agenda.

>> On the other hand, while you rarely reply to any of my technical
>> points, I know others are reading this too and would encourage
>> anyone who is curious to root around and find out themselves.

On the contrary, your complaint with me is that I have frequently replied to your technical points. I don't agree with them, and you can't accept that.

People are not automatons, and they do not need you to encourage them to "root around and find out for themselves." If they are reading this, then they are already looking.

In the interest of brevity, I'll point you to my recent reply about this same pseudo-technical rant you've made. You go over and over the same points, but always make the same mistakes of oversimplifying a direct radiator as pure quadrature and a horn as purely resistive. Both assertions are inaccurate, and both lead you down the same flawed path to the same self-serving but incorrect conclusions.

You can't possibly be so arrogant as to think you are the only person that understands these kinds of systems so completely. Then again, it appears that is exactly what you think.

But Tom, you're boring me with this stuff. I've got more important things to do, and this just isn't all that tough. Deal with it; Perhaps you might try something a little more intellectually stimulating to give yourself a new challenge.

Wayne


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  McShane Design  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.