Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded
PASS J2 Vs Yamamoto AO8-S
64.12.116.16 |
||
Posted on November 1, 2009 at 11:07:31 | ||
Posts: 942
Joined: September 2, 2001 |
I gave up on solid state amplification many years ago. Let's see, it was about 1981 when I brought home an UGLY pair of Leak TL-25 Plus EL34 mono block 25 watt amplifiers to fiddle with. They were a trade in at an audio salon that I was managing at the time. I unhooked my Naim NAP 250 from my Chartwell LS3\5a's and (after manufacturing proper plugs) plugged in the Leaks. Never looked back, even though I still think that the bigger/better naim amps and some of the Levinson amps (23.5 and 27.5) are quite good at what they do best. Years later I found an even more intriguing match, high efficiency speakers mated with singe ended tube amplification. My favorite flavor being 45 based set amplifiers. Of that genre, I found the Yamamoto AO8-S handily outperformed all others that I have tried (not saying that there is not better, I just have not heard it yet). My second favorites are actually various vintage 6BQ5 amplifiers, remarkable! I never even considered solid state amps again until the Pass First Watt stuff hit the ground. I was fortunte to evaluate the F1 and F3 units in my own listening environment. In my opinion, not even close. The yamamoto was still in a different league. So, I really had no interest in the F4 or F5 because I felt them likely to be a slight variation on the previous themes. The opportunity arose for me to play with the new PASS J2 amplifier for a couple of weeks at home. I packed it up and sent it back yesterday. No, I was not upset having to part with the J2. I did not feel the need to scramble to find the funds to keep this amplifier. BUT, if I had owned the J2 and was evaluating the Yamamoto, I would feel the same way and returned the AO8-S. I found these two amplifiers to be sonically interchangable for my needs. Of course we are comparing a 2 watt amplifier with a 25 watt unit. But since I only need/use the "First Watt" or so with my high efficiency speakers, I did not give a hoot about the added power in the J2. What did matter was the J2's ability to bring the "Lit From Within" magical quality that my Yamamoto with EML solid plate 45's always did better than every other amplifier. These two amplifiers just sound so much alike. The AO8-S actually offers a bit more dynamics within it's limited power band and certain aspects of vocals may be a tad bit more fleshed out with the tube amp, maybe. This is the first time sinse I purchased the Yamamoto that I would have been perfectly comfortable sending it back and keeping the J2. If I were starting over and could choose between these two amplifiers, then it would come down to price, reliability, serviceability and obviously power requirement which translates to flexibility. The Yammy still costs less, even with a pair of EML's (but it's close). Tubes are going to ware out and need replacement. That's around $500.00 for a pair of EML's! I have no idea where I would have my Yammy serviced and the manufacturer does not supply a schematic. Now, two Vs 25 watts? I currently do not need more than two watts, but that dramatic difference in power flexibility WILL come in hany at some point. Right now I must bi-amp. A seperate more powerful amplifier to drive either my 12" Tone Tubby Alnico Hemp Cones, or my vintage (brand new Great Planes 16 Ohm cones) Altec 416 B's, and the two watt Yamamoto to drive my eight inch full/wide range drivers and sometimes tweeters. The J2 would give me the option of driving the whole works from one sonically contiguous amplifier! Or, Or I could experiment with something like a vintage pair of 15" Tannoy coaxials or Altec Model 19's etc.... while still retaining almost all of the magic derived from the little 45 SET amplifier. Get the point? Lance A. |