Computer Audio Asylum

Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies.

Return to Computer Audio Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

USB Cable for Ayre QB-9 (Transparent?)

24.15.52.181

Posted on November 29, 2009 at 12:49:25
BlackstoneEsq
Audiophile

Posts: 16
Location: Chicago
Joined: November 29, 2009
I am thinking about a Transparent Performance USB cable ($130/10ft.) for use with my new Ayre QB-9 USB DAC.

My question is whether anyone on the board has actual experience with this cable or other "high-end" USB cables and whether they actually found a difference with an ASYNCHRONOUS USB DAC (Ayre, Wavelength, or dCS).

I THINK I hear a difference between two cheapo cables that I have (an old grey generic and a $40 Dynex), but I'm not sure. I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who has actually taken the time to test two different USB cables.

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: USB Cable for Ayre QB-9 (Transparent?), posted on November 29, 2009 at 13:08:58
Mercman
Audiophile

Posts: 6581
Location: So. CA
Joined: October 20, 2002
I recently tried the Transparent with my Wavelength Crimson. I liked it very much and thought it was great for the money.

 

Dave Clark of PFO...., posted on November 29, 2009 at 14:42:36
alan m. kafton
Manufacturer

Posts: 5285
Joined: April 7, 2000
....has reviewed various USB cables (from cheapo to expensive) and found the various designs from Locus to be excellent. The newer models, such as the Nucleus, are pricier, but have much higher performance. In this case, you getz what you payz for.

 

RE: USB Cable for Ayre QB-9 (Transparent?), posted on November 29, 2009 at 15:38:18
David Clark


 
I believe that Ayre endorses Transparent's USB cable.

 

RE: USB Cable for Ayre QB-9 (Transparent?), posted on November 29, 2009 at 16:49:43
howgeif
Audiophile

Posts: 354
Location: Northern California
Joined: April 23, 2002
I am using the Transparent USB $90 cable from my MAC Book Pro computer to my Ayre QB-9 USB DAC. My retailer is suggesting the Synergistic Research's Tesla Tricon USB $550 (WOW, that is expensive!) cable but I do not believe a $550+ USB cable will not make a significant difference over my Transparent USB cable. My system sounds great with the Ayre DAC using the Transparent USB Cable and I see no reason to change or spend more money.

 

You won't know for certain...., posted on November 29, 2009 at 17:06:37
alan m. kafton
Manufacturer

Posts: 5285
Joined: April 7, 2000
....unless you try the SR cable. If you're able to audition it without obligation, why not? What happens if it outperforms the Transparent? Don't presume anything.

 

RE: You won't know for certain...., posted on November 29, 2009 at 17:42:55
cfmsp
Audiophile

Posts: 526
Joined: October 21, 2006

If a $500 cable made a significant improvement - which is doubtful - I'd NOT spend the money on the cable but rather, I'd find the source of the problem and use the $500 to address it. There is NOTHING a USB cable in Async mode should/could be doing that justifies that type of expense, IMO.

YMMV,
clay

 

RE: USB Cable for Ayre QB-9 (Transparent?), posted on November 29, 2009 at 18:56:37
Where can this cable be purchased?

 

RE: USB Cable for Ayre QB-9 (Transparent?), posted on November 29, 2009 at 18:59:10
What did you like it better than, and what did you like more than it?

 

RE: You won't know for certain...., posted on November 29, 2009 at 19:10:53
rick_m
Audiophile

Posts: 6230
Location: Oregon
Joined: August 11, 2005
"I'd NOT spend the money on the cable but rather, I'd find the source of the problem"

Hear hear!

I largely feel the same way about power cords and their appurtenances. I've done a little with them but try to avoid looking too hard until I feel ready to spend the effort to fix whatever I find. I would never in a billion years spend a lot of money on a power cords packed with fairy dust trying to patch a problem at the wrong spot. Not really a matter of reason so much as philosophy.

Glad I'm not alone...

Rick

 

RE: You won't know for certain...., posted on November 29, 2009 at 19:35:03
cfmsp
Audiophile

Posts: 526
Joined: October 21, 2006

"Glad I'm not alone..."

Actually you're in good company with regards to 'fancy' power cables.

Nelson Pass recommends against upgraded power cables for his amplifiers. I'd say he knows more than a bit about the proper use of AC.

That's not to say that some AC circuits don't need tuning, just that the power cable is not attacking the source of the problem. I'm in the midst of a project to do that - I live in an apartment building and don't have control over the circuit. :)

clay

 

Anything will change the character of sound, posted on November 30, 2009 at 07:04:46
Gordon Rankin
Manufacturer

Posts: 2928
Joined: June 9, 2000
Guys,

Any USB cable will change the character of sound. Why?? no firm reasons only ideas...

What I would suggest any person reading this is make sure the dealer will take back the cable if it is not better or what is expected for that caliber of cable.... price.

I tested a bunch of cables after RMAF some of them did not even pass basic tests.

I can tell you the shorter the cable the better within reason. If you get the DAC too close to the computer then you may have other issues. But 1/2M sounded and tested better than 1, 2 and 3. I would not go over 3M with a 24/96 dac.

Thanks
Gordon
J. Gordon Rankin

 

RE: Anything will change the character of sound, posted on November 30, 2009 at 07:36:51
TubeDriver
Audiophile

Posts: 794
Location: East Coast
Joined: February 16, 2007
What "issues" occur when the DAC is too close to the computer?

 

RE: I'm with you both., posted on November 30, 2009 at 08:35:42
aljordan
Audiophile

Posts: 1252
Location: Southern Maine
Joined: November 4, 2003
Of course, I've never been able to hear a difference between power cords. Maybe its because I use Pass amps and a pre-amp built like a brick outhouse.

 

RE: I'm with you both., posted on November 30, 2009 at 10:48:04
Ryelands
Audiophile

Posts: 1867
Location: Scotland
Joined: January 9, 2009
I've never been able to hear a difference between power cords. Maybe its because I use Pass amps

I suspect it's also a function of the quality of the mains. A good, low-impedance supply will probably benefit less from after-market cables.

Some argue it's as much to do with keeping noise from the kit polluting the mains as vice versa. This seems reasonable and suggests it's worthwhile using a noise-inhibiting design on all equipment (inc PCs), not just amps.

There is convincing literature to support the point but, though I've seen plenty marketing tosh for exotic metallurgy such as Rhodium-plated plugs, I know of no technical explanations of their benefits.

Home-brew made it feasible for me to use a plaited-design mains lead on every audio and digital device in the house. They certainly improved the picture on consumer-level TVs and LCD monitors and made a difference to the audio. I assume (but have no proof) that they keep the mains cleaner as well. As ever, YMMV.

Dave

 

RE: plaited-design mains lead, posted on November 30, 2009 at 11:59:13
rick_m
Audiophile

Posts: 6230
Location: Oregon
Joined: August 11, 2005
A few questions...

-220V?
-Three wire?
-Replacing what, twisted, parallel, shielded?
-In what manner was the picture and sound improved?

Just curious. If you found something that made a big difference I'd like to try it on a DIY basis.

My main (pardon pun) point was that just about anything potential problem that could be affected by the power cord et al should be controlled by the design of the gear.

Well I'd better go finish installing the wretched dishwasher. I hate plumbing, at least electricity doesn't leak all over the place.

Rick

 

RE: plaited-design mains lead, posted on November 30, 2009 at 13:46:11
Ryelands
Audiophile

Posts: 1867
Location: Scotland
Joined: January 9, 2009
A few questions...

220V?


230V nominal, typically in the UK 240V so, basically, yes. Cable gurus claim that 110V's increased current makes cables more important - may be true for Megawatt amps but probably not on my side of the tracks.

Three wire?

Yes - don't ask me why but using the design on two-wired inputs didn't seem as effective. Probably imagination or coincidence.

Replacing what, twisted, parallel, shielded?

Replacing whatever the manufacturer had supplied or some c**p of my own - all "low end". I'd hitherto been a "cable sceptic" and essentially remain one. Ben Duncan's empirical demonstration and John S comments herein coaxed me to rethink mains cables. (The "skin effect" I most readily recognise is the thin skin of some list members.)

In what manner was the picture and sound improved?

The picture is sharper, a bit like cleaning one's specs. (Ever tried that? Super tweak if you use a videophile cloth.) Audio, just a bit smoother.

If you found something that made a big difference I'd like to try it on a DIY basis.

I don't know what you mean by "big" but, for the price (almost nothing), it was well worth it for me. A month on two back, I sent a sample to a fellow inmate (don't worry, your secret is safe . . . ) as a trial but all went quiet. I'll send you tedious construction details & pix off-list as I've posted them before.

[Any] problem that could be affected by the power cord . . . should be controlled by the design of the gear.

In an ideal world, I agree completely but it might also up costs beyond my reach, esp as I now use about 15 of the things and even more esp for the likes of a cheap monitor which costs less than most Kimber Kables (which the design resembles).

DIY's fine by me - it's how I get my own back . . .

Dave

 

RE: plaited-design mains lead, posted on November 30, 2009 at 16:30:56
rick_m
Audiophile

Posts: 6230
Location: Oregon
Joined: August 11, 2005
Well, that really sounds interesting. I look forward to seeing what you did. I don't think I'm a skeptic, merely skeptical. You know...

But I've probably wagged you the tale of being a big-time cable skeptic, especially about interconnects and eventually learning that I was very wrong. I have long since done my due-diligence with interconnects and speaker cables and am happy with the results. But have been putting off power cords specifically because they fall in a different one of my mental bins.

I mostly asked about the 220Vish thing because I wanted to confirm that your country uses balanced power. Mine has a tremendous power imbalance that causes all sorts of problems, even with stereos.

Since I'm now sort of retired there's almost no excuse not to pursue the power side. It's a matter of priority and my wife seems to think that ridding our kitchen of all the dicky appliances is more important. I have to admit that eating is right up there with music as something I like so maybe she has a point.

I'm not saying that power cords don't make a difference, merely that they shouldn't. But that's largely true of all of them and a lot of the likely root causes of cable sensitivity would be difficult to address for most folks, me included, so dinking with the power cables has some, little, appeal. Could be fun, the interconnects were.

By the way IMHE (the E is estimation) the cost of fixing this stuff, whatever the stuff is, at the gear/cable interface would be cheaper and more effective. Really by 'big' I mean if it's a difference that's significant to you. I guess I've come to the belief that you are a reliable observer.

Regards, Rick

 

RE: USB Cable for Ayre QB-9 (Transparent?), posted on November 30, 2009 at 18:01:11
BlackstoneEsq
Audiophile

Posts: 16
Location: Chicago
Joined: November 29, 2009
I bought the Transparent. Listening to it now. So far I do think it sounds better. Thanks for the helpful responses I will post back with more details.

 

Response to Deleted post from one of the resident know-it-alls, posted on November 30, 2009 at 18:49:32
cfmsp
Audiophile

Posts: 526
Joined: October 21, 2006
One of the resident know-it-alls (who shall remain nameless unless he responds to this as he deleted the post after it had hit my inbox, denying me the opportunity to respond directly) posted a response to my post:

Clay says:

"Actually you're in good company with regards to 'fancy' power cables.

Nelson Pass recommends against upgraded power cables for his amplifiers. I'd say he knows more than a bit about the proper use of AC.

That's not to say that some AC circuits don't need tuning, just that the power cable is not attacking the source of the problem. I'm in the midst of a project to do that - I live in an apartment building and don't have control over the circuit. :)"


To which Mr. Know-it-all responded:

"Your position is utter nonsense....
------------------------------
...and completely misguided and uninformed. And not just about Pass amplification. You obviously have no idea how many people use premium aftermarket power cables with Pass amps and preamps, both with great success and improved performance. [stuff snipped to prevent possible identification]. Stock cables simply do not perform up to the same level."


Dear Know-it-all,

The 'position' you refer to as "utter nonsense and completely misguided and uninformed" is that of Nelson Pass, a quite well respected designer of some of the best sounding circuits in all of amplification. I did not present it as MY position, but rather as his recommendation. I believe this is clear in my comments (repeated above for your benefit).

The fact that other people might use aftermarket power cables does next to nothing to diminish Mr Pass' recommendation, in my view. By the way, in response to your question - do you know how many people with Pass amps actually follow Nelson's recommendations versus your own? I didn't think so.

You go on to further castigate Mr Pass with these words:

"Some equipment designers still have their heads in the sand regarding power cabling, presuming that "wire-is-wire", as long as the gauge of the power cable meets their engineering philosophy. [more stuff snipped due to being irrelevant analogies to computer audio]".

Mr Pass would no doubt find your thoughts quite amusing.

Finally, your comments actually refer to my words, when you say:

"These glib responses and attitudes, including such pejorative comments like "fancy power cables" does nothing to further the art, or science of
listening."

I'm not looking to further the art - I'm looking to get the best sounding system for the best value. That I don't subscribe to your idea that a more expensive cable will always be better than stock (as you state above) is NOT an impediment to furthering the art of listening. Indeed, I'd think of it more as a stepping-stone.

In my earlier post in the thread I said - if a $500 cable sounds better, I would seek out the source of the problem (as opposed to trying to fix it with an expensive cable).

That's MY contribution to furthering the art - i.e. trying to identify the source of the problem - in the case of 'fancy power cords that might be poor AC circuits, as an example - rather than promoting expensive band-aids at very high margins, such as you do. NOTE [Mr. Know-It-All IS a dealer of, among other things, expensive cables]

I even noted in my post that I was currently engaged in such a project.

You go on to ask:

"Have you experienced any premium power cables on Pass gear? Your comment indicates no. For if you had such experience, you wouldn't have made that comment in the first place."

Indeed, I have experienced 'fancy' power cables on Pass gear. I used a well regarded aftermarket power cable until recently when I upgraded to a First Watt J2. As an afterthought, I switched out the premium cable and replaced it with the cable that Nelson had provided, once the J2 was broken-in. Imagine my surprise when it sounded much improved with the 'stock cable', esp. since I did not have proper AC line conditioning at the time. Perhaps I can share the brand's name after I dispose of it on Audiogon. No sense running the price down while I'm still long.

Finally you say:

"Yet by your logic, since many premium aftermarket power cables actually improve the performance of Pass gear, there must be something intrinsically wrong with Nelson's designs. Very bad logic. The reality is quite different."

Uhm, no, that would be your twisted interpretation.

By following my thought process - I hesitate to call it logic - I would investigate whether proper AC circuit tuning would be appropriate in those instances given that poor quality of AC will likely affect any amplifier.

I simply happen to believe that expensive power cords are not a cost-effective solution, although admittedly a dealer motivated by profits might feel otherwise. Probably the last thing I would infer from an environment in which Nelson's amps were affected by power cords would be to assume something was intrinsically wrong with Nelson's designs.

That you did says a lot about you and nothing about that which you lash out at.

clay


 

RE: Response to Deleted post from one of the resident know-it-alls, posted on November 30, 2009 at 20:06:30
Old Listener
Audiophile

Posts: 2090
Location: SF Bay area
Joined: February 6, 2005
Good post.

> To which Mr. Know-it-all responded:...

Inquiring minds would like to know Mr. Know-it-all's screen name. I suspect that he sells fancy cables and other band-aids. I'd certainly want to avoid buying a DAC or a reclocker from him.

Mr. Know... said
"These glib responses and attitudes, including such pejorative comments like "fancy power cables" does nothing to further the art, or science of
listening."

Mr. Know-it-all is probably in the running for the Nobel Prize for "fancy power cables". Let's not spoil his chances.

Bill


my blog: http://carsmusicandnature.blogspot.com/

 

RE: USB Cable for Ayre QB-9 (Transparent?), posted on November 30, 2009 at 21:29:54
BlackstoneEsq
Audiophile

Posts: 16
Location: Chicago
Joined: November 29, 2009
The Transparent USB I picked up tonight is 10 feet in length. I am comparing it to a Dynex with gold connectors that I bought at Best Buy for about $40. The Dynex is also 10 feet in length.

The Dynex is considerably thinner. The Transparent is at least twice the thickness.

Normally when I make a cable change I can hear the difference almost immediately and the change is sufficient that I am satisfied what I am hearing is not a placebo. This time, not so much. I'm just not sure there is a difference. If anything, there might be a slightly more information and a little more focus, but it is within that margin where I am not sure if what I am hearing is real.

 

RE: Response to Deleted post from one of the resident know-it-alls, posted on December 1, 2009 at 05:55:34
cfmsp
Audiophile

Posts: 526
Joined: October 21, 2006

Old Listener, thanks for the kind words on my post.


"I'd certainly want to avoid buying a DAC or a reclocker from him."

One need only notice the obvious to determine the poster.

And knowing even as little as I know about you, I"d say you're in no danger of buying anything from this dealer/manufacturer, as you don't seem the type to buy cable cookers, $450 CD demagnetizers, or $800 cryogenically treated power strips made of 'unobtainium'.

clay


 

RE: Response to Deleted post from one of the resident know-it-alls, posted on December 1, 2009 at 12:48:12
Mercman
Audiophile

Posts: 6581
Location: So. CA
Joined: October 20, 2002
Stock cables on my amps. A fancy shmancy Synergistic Research Hologram D on my DAC.

Really no big deal.

 

RE: Response to Deleted post from one of the resident know-it-alls, posted on December 1, 2009 at 16:47:15
cfmsp
Audiophile

Posts: 526
Joined: October 21, 2006


"Really no big deal."

Agreed. The point of my earlier post was to disagree with a dealer/manufacturer's contention that stock cables are always outperformed by aftermarket.

I'm also in agreement with those who believe that the DAC could be more sensitive to power than other components, although I only use an upgraded power supply - with standard cable on my ULN-2. Gordon's Proton, which I also use, has the best AC power cable of all - none.

 

RE: Response to Deleted post from one of the resident know-it-alls, posted on December 1, 2009 at 17:16:15
Mercman
Audiophile

Posts: 6581
Location: So. CA
Joined: October 20, 2002
"The point of my earlier post was to disagree with a dealer/manufacturer's contention that stock cables are always outperformed by aftermarket."

Not always.

 

Page processed in 0.034 seconds.