General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

Return to General Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

REVIEW: Magnum Dynalab FT-101A Tuner

71.225.3.30

Posted on November 9, 2007 at 17:56:03
Barry
Audiophile

Posts: 1003
Location: PA
Joined: November 24, 1999
Contributor
  Since:
January 18, 2009
Model: FT-101A
Category: Tuner
Suggested Retail Price: $975
Description: FM Tuner
Manufacturer URL: Magnum Dynalab

Review by Barry on November 09, 2007 at 17:56:03
IP Address: 71.225.3.30
Add Your Review
for the FT-101A


I too had a Magnum Dynalab Etude for many years. The sound is described very accurately on the Tuner Information Center website (read the entire site - everything its great.) In a nutshell -- dry, not much bass or particularly dynamic. Air around instruments and 3D soundstage? No way. It improved if left on 2 or 3 days but not by much. I never listened to it - did pull in stations pretty well though. I liked an old Dyna FM-5 by Frank Van Alstine much better

So i sold it & bought the Sansui TU-717. It was a noticeable step up and for a lot less. Some warmth much better high end and some semblence of real music.

But wait it gets better. With only 2 hours work replacing all the power supply parts with 2-4 xs larger (Black Gate) caps and taking out the old diodes in exchange for Schottky's the result is amazing and I haven't even got to the rest of the APS filter matching mods, F-connector etc.. Very real audiophile quality incredible bass + warm & wonderful realistic mid-range and acceptable though still not great highs - some soundstage and air. The FT101A Etude's not even close.


Product Weakness: Many. See above
Product Strengths: A very pretty face!


Associated Equipment for this Review:

Amplifier: tri-amped Class A
Preamplifier (or None if Integrated): pass labs X02
Sources (CDP/Turntable): tuner!!!!!!
Speakers: Maggies and huge subs
Cables/Interconnects: DH labs Revelations
Music Used (Genre/Selections): It's a tuner!!!!!
Other (Power Conditioner etc.): All
Type of Audition/Review: Product Owner


 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: REVIEW: Magnum Dynalab FT-101A Tuner, posted on November 10, 2007 at 04:52:22
Chickenologist
Audiophile

Posts: 18
Joined: August 16, 2001
Barry,

I have had an FT-101A for more than 10 years now.
When I listen to the stations that play popular music, I hear exactly what you described. However, when I listen to Minnesota Public Radio, it sounds very, very good. The stage is everything but flat and the bass is fine.
No air around instruments??? No way. I can easily tell the difference between LP's and CD's.
I have read very negative and very positive reviews and I have no idea why so much difference in opinions. Mine is very positive.
I listen to the radio a lot and this little tuner has given me a lot of pleasure.

Chickenologist

 

RE: REVIEW: Magnum Dynalab FT-101A Tuner, posted on November 10, 2007 at 07:54:50
Um Barry, your comments sound very much like you are describing a compressed FM signal and not the real character of the FT-101. I have owned 3 MD tuners and with a decent properly setup antenna and a quality signal, they all have bass, air and sound stage galore.
Bill.

 

RE: REVIEW: Magnum Dynalab FT-101A Tuner, posted on November 10, 2007 at 08:38:56
FidPup
Audiophile

Posts: 180
Location: SW Ohio
Joined: July 2, 2007
I own an Etude, and use it to listen mostly to local Public Radio (Classical and Traditional/Folk/Celtic music).

This tuner, although not technically as "accurate" as my other sources, is probably the most relaxing to listen to. I have NO complaints at all with the dynamic range (our local classical station has the least compressed, highest quality FM signal I've ever heard... they even use tube equipment!) or bass quality/quantity. The treble is very listenable, and not "dry" at all.

I honestly believe that what I hear through the Etude is reasonably close to what a station engineer would hear through the station's broadcast monitor.

My previous tuner, on the other hand (a Kenwood KT-815) was the dryest, grittiest, thinnest and most bass-starved component I ever owned. Nasty!!

Ken

 

RE: REVIEW: Magnum Dynalab FT-101A Tuner, posted on November 10, 2007 at 08:58:40
Mr_bill2
Audiophile

Posts: 2178
Joined: September 17, 2002
I have a similiar experience with my MD FT-101 tuner.

On "popular" type radio stations, forget it, I could do just as good if not better on my wife's portable Sony Bean(MP3/FM player) that she uses on her daily metro ride into the city. But on our local PBS stations like Pacifica Radio(WPFW 89.3fm here in NoVA) it's like night and day. The sound is full and very pleasing.

It kind of makes me wonder how a little "listener donations driven station" can sound SO much better than a "high dollar advertisement driven radio station"? Obviously it must be a matter of priorities...long live PBS!!

 

RE: REVIEW: Magnum Dynalab FT-101A Tuner, posted on November 11, 2007 at 09:55:45
Bob G


 
I've never heard an FT-101A, but I've gone through a handful of other tuners, both analog and digital, and the one I chose to keep is my TU-717. I did the power supply mods you mention to all of them and much more extensive mods to a couple of others, but the tuner that has brought me the most musical satisfaction has been the Sansui.

On the Sansui I did all the mods suggested at The Tuner Information Center and they turned the already good sounding tuner into, as you say, a real audiophile quality piece of equipment. Too, a good antenna helps a lot.

I listen mostly to a low powered, publicly sponsored classical station that is located about fifty miles away from me, and I just couldn't ask for better reception, better fidelity, or a better musical experience.

A lot of people put FM down as a serious listening experience, but when it's done right, it can be extremely satisfying.

Bob

 

(Discontinued) Magnum Dynalab FT-101A Tuner, posted on November 11, 2007 at 12:30:34
cdb


 
could be up-dated to a 102T for $2300. For those of us who don't have access to (discontinued) Sansui's, MD offers an alternative.

No bass- Well, FM stops at 50HZ.
No dynamics - Comes with FM transmission, free of charge. Judging by the meters on my CDR, I've yet to see any station - though others have different experiences - have anything in the way of meaningful dynamics.
Signal processing - Comes with the game. See the Orban site (below) for what is available to corrupt an FM transmission.
Antenna connection- Cheap coax and connectors does *not help things in any way.

Having said that, what I've noticed with my MD-102T, is that audio quality is heavily dependant on the amount of signal being dumped into the antenna inputs. The MD (and I suspect most other hi-grade tuners) doesn't begin to shine until there's a strong enough signal to eliminate that lo-level background hissy-swirly fine-grained weak signal noise.

Though most pop stations are long-term unlistenable, there's enough good jazz and classical out there to make a decent FM setup as musically enjoyable as any vinyl or CD source.



 

RE: REVIEW: Magnum Dynalab FT-101A Tuner, posted on January 28, 2010 at 00:06:11
capitalist_slave
Audiophile

Posts: 15
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Joined: July 15, 2005
I bought mine in the mid 90's. It has been powered up almost 24/7 minus the power outages. So far no problems, no service, no upgrades - no nothing.

It works great - why argue with success? Just because someone who could be the very person who is running an upgrade service is urging me get it serviced or buy something used and have it serviced as well :-) With Naim-Audio gear and (SF Electa Amator II's, Quad 989, SF Guarneri and Klipsch Forte-1's) I hear detailed, slightly warm sound - no fatigue and can be very engaging. I think 'pleasant' or 'semi-warm' mid-range is my way of describing it. Not 'thin' by any sense of the word. There isn't anything that sticks out that would annoy anyone. Base-freaks probably will not be pleased because low-end response is about average - it sligtly improves with my REL B1 sub. Staging can be deep & wide, in some cases wider than the speakers depending on the program.

Imaging of instruments & vocalists is good but I wouldn't go as far as 'pin point imaging'. It's certainly not vague or an abstract wall of sound - there's a sense of placement and separation.

There's some floor noise with Etude but not significant enough to distract. It's not the the quietest tuner I have listened. The sound is about even with the speaker plane - not recessed or forward. This tuner is sensitive to microphone effects during news broadcasts and poorly recorded music on certain programs. Lack of sibilance is better than average which I think is minus one big distraction. I have the external antena but never needed it. The rabbit ears from Dynalab gives strong reception from local stations.

My other choices would have been either Linn or Naim but prices of those units in the mid 90's were quite a bit higher than Etude which has been an excellent compromise.

I read some of the reviews on
http://www.fmtunerinfo.com/reviewsM-N.html#magnum
I auditioned some of the units that were in the shoot-out. The analogies the reviewer was using comparing some of the units to girls he either once dated or wanted to date - whatever it was - it's corny, rednecky, and total waste of time. The reviewer is one step away from writing the audio-porn - poor man's sixmoons.audio type of review except those guys at least take good photographs but that's where it ends.

When I read sixmoons.audio reviews on few occasions, it was like the reviewer was describing his sexual fantasies with some imaginative partner. In all cases he's always having this big f... session with this equipment that costs the price of a luxury car - nothing more than audio-fiction but audio-porn would be more descriptive.

The reviewers are errand-boys for the manufacturers. All I got out of FM tuner reviews was about which product had more base and could pick up more stations.

Thanks but no thanks.

 

RE: REVIEW: Magnum Dynalab FT-101A Tuner, posted on January 5, 2018 at 05:14:53
drbarney1
Audiophile

Posts: 14
Location: Delaware
Joined: August 17, 2013
I am preparing to replace my tuner that after 30 years of faithful service needs an IC that is soldered directly to the circuit board replaced and the IC has 42 pins, anso other things in the tuner no longer work. I acquired a Magnum Dynalab FT 101A and I plan to replace op amp NE5532 with a Burr Brown OPA2604, the output capacitors with better capacitors, and HEXFRED diodes in the power supply along with a Black Gate filter capacitor.
These upgrades seem to be reported to inexpensively make this tuner its best at a reasonable price. I am open to suggestions.
The PBS stations are limited by their use of red book digital which they convert to analog when it goes to the transmitter and tower and an expensive high end DAC in many home systems outclasses the standard DAC of a radio ststion so the sound from the FM station is good, but only as good as the station's DAC. Therefore that seems to limit how much it makes sense to spend on an FM tuner, $6,000 should be unable to justify. But a good tuner for a few hundred dollars should be just as good as the audio that an FM station has to offer. Of course I would never use a tuner to listen to pop music which I hate.

 

RE: REVIEW: Magnum Dynalab FT-101A Tuner, posted on January 14, 2018 at 07:07:55
drbarney1
Audiophile

Posts: 14
Location: Delaware
Joined: August 17, 2013
I replaced a McIntosh MC 7082 tuner that went bad and for which I could no longer get a replacement circuit board with a Magnum Dynalab FT101-A tuner and it outclassed what the MC 7082 could do. However, for it to work as well as a later Magnum Dynalab tuner that costs several thousands more for about three more dB sensitivity or a signal sleuth, which is a chore to readjust every time I change the station - and it amplifies all the noise picked by the cable between the antenna and my antenna selector switch, I get what I think are ideal results by putting an antenna pre-amplifier on each of my antennas. The pre-amplifiers directly pass through the rf from the antenna when they are not turned on. The stations I listen to are about 100 miles from my house and my FM antennas are 30 feet high on towers, one pointed to each distant station. With the antenna pre-amplifiers turned off I get a signal strength reading of about 2.4 and sometimes no stereo, but with the antenna pre-amplifiers on it is between 8 and 9 with stereo. This probably outclasses what a signal sleuth could do.
I am interested in the power supply upgrade kit if it can be purchased and Schottky bridge rectifiers if they will fit the circuit board. Where can I get them?

 

Page processed in 0.038 seconds.