![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
143.236.92.53
In Reply to: RE: 3 way XO- Behringer or DBX, or...? posted by HiOnFi on October 08, 2010 at 12:55:38
Hey bonehead....
Read your original bozo post
You post lacks information
What is your question?
If you want to control a system actively 3way stereo then simply go
out and buy a 3way stereo xover or use the xovers you have MONO 3way
and one active xover per channel
Both the DBX and the Behringer are 2way stereo or 3way mono
Follow Ups:
The problem with both is that neither is a true 2 way stereo, or 3 way mono. Both offer adjustable XO and volume for the mids, but both only provide volume control of the high frequencies. Buyer beware.
Now DBX does have a 234XL which is supposed to be a true 3 way, and Behringer offers the DCX 2496, but both are considerably more expensive.
Well having steep slopes is the key so you have no phase issues
Linkwitz Riley @24db per octave slopes should be minimum
Since you are running pro equipment why not have better control and slope
choices and better bandwidth overlap control and use a DBX driverack?
You have 31band eq/parametric eq/slope choices/bandwidth choices/compression/limiter etc
You can run pink noise and use a measurment mic and really dial those maggies in
There is better driveracks then the pa model but they will cost you
much more money
I have a DBX driverack pa, and I use RANE active xovers on my pro sound gear
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: