Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share youe ideas and experiences.
Return to K&K Audio / Lundahl Transformers
99.178.170.125
It's been a while in coming, but I did a long, long break-in and then listened back and forth to both versions of the LL1931 using the Premium Maxxed-Out Phono Preamp and the Sonus Veritas Venice Phono Preamp. It wasn't in any way difficult to hear the difference between the original LL1931 (using Cardas sourced copper wire) and the LL1931Ag, but thoroughness seemed reasonable given the price difference!
I heard two important differences pretty quickly and easily. There was a significant change in the tonal balance in the upper midrange / treble that made music listened to through the LL1931Ag more relaxed and yet, at the same time, more exciting due to the perception of more contrast between subtle details. I didn't hear this as darkness, but as a lower distortion result, where smaller contrasts were more apparent, but still well-placed in the context of the overall piece of music.
With more listening to classical music, in particular, it was clear that I was able to hear with "new ears" various harmonic lines that I had never really paid any attention to. Upon relistening to the same pieces with the copper LL1931s, I could now hear these same lines, but it required much more effort. That's not to say that the presentation with the LL1931Ags was "spotlighted", but it was more fun, because there was just more music to "chew" on in many old, familiar recordings.
In some ways the silver transformers provided the same effect (compared to the copper transformers) of moving from Row P in the concert hall to perhaps Row H, where individual instruments and even whole sections in the orchestra are somewhat more vividly portrayed, but aren't nearly so close as to feel "in your face". In contrast to this idea, though, is the observation that the silver transformers also provided a bigger, deeper soundstage than the copper transformers did in recordings that excel in the creation of the a replicated performance space. I look at this as a happy "twofer"!
OK, enough audiophile talk. I can say without reservation that I like the LL1931Ag transformers more than well enough not to part with them. They don't "blow away" the LL1931 wound with Cardas copper wire, but they do give you a pretty good-sized improvement in musical enjoyment. Whether that increment is enough to justify the $800 (each) price is a matter of your budgetary constraints, if any exist (:+)).
Kevin Carter
K&K Audio
www.kandkaudio.com
Follow Ups:
Hi,
did you ever hear the 1933 or 1943 with mu metal core in comparison to the 1931 and 1941 with amorphous core, either the cardas or the silver wired version?
Thanks for any information.
I have compared the copper LL1931 to the copper LL1933. Clearly they sound pretty similar, because the only difference between them is the core material. However, there is a sonic difference. Put simply, the LL1931 has a more detailed, resolving character, but some listeners regard the highly detailed presentation as a type of coolness. The LL1933 has a somewhat warmer, but slightly less resolving sound. Another way of presenting the difference is that the LL1933 uses bigger sonic brushstrokes to paint the sound, whereas the LL1931 presents the whole in relatively fine detail.
You might hear the breathing of a close-miked solo performer with real clarity using the LL1931, whereas the LL1933 will allow you to hear the breathing, but it would appear more as background compared to the flow of the music.
With the right recordings cued up these are easy things to hear, but damned difficult to describe with words!
Kevin Carter
K&K Audio
www.kandkaudio.com
Thanks for your nice description, it helps!
Did you also made any comparison with the 1931 and 1941. How do they sound, if both are wired for 1:16?
Or generally: would you take a step up with a lower or higher ratio (more or less winding) if the ratio is the same?
I have not directly compared these two at 1:16. I would say that if your cartridge is in the group of low output (and low source impedance, 1-10ohms) MC cartridges, including many Ortofon, EMT, Transfiguration cartridges, they are likely to sound better with a higher ratio step-up like the LL1941. If yours is among the higher source impedance MC cartridges, the LL1931 is perhaps a better match, particularly the higher output MC cartridges.
Kevin Carter
K&K Audio
www.kandkaudio.com
May i ask these questions once again?
Any chance silver wound SE OPT? Like 9202 with silver winding.
Looks like Thomas Mayer has gotten a hold of some bigger silver lundahls... not 9202 but 1660...
http://vinylsavor.blogspot.com/
FWIW,
-Ed
Thanks for the impressions! Those sound like the ultimate MC stepups. I wish they were less $ but it's not surprising they are a premium offering. ;-)
-Ed
Kevin,
Looking forward to receiving my pair, an inexcusable birthday present from me to myself.
I really like the colorful Lundahl design theme in the background BTW. Compliments to the creator. I expect the theme to show up on the K&K homepage soon :)
/Jonas
Hello Kelvin,
your review mirror my impression. I have a silver step-up transformer of different brand. One interesting thing is, of course I am referring to my own system, I notice I can only have so many silver components e.g. step up, internal wiring, interconnects.....once it past certain point, the "grand" tonal balance will suffer. Today, my MC silver step up is only silver component in the signal chain and I truly enjoy it.
Walter
.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: