|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
74.214.45.172
In Reply to: Here you go. (links) posted by HenryH on May 14, 2007 at 10:52:56:
confirmed by Tony at Parasound.
Henry
Follow Ups:
...the specs in the review are correct. Per Richard Scram of Parasound.
the 'specs' tab at this link says 47k/100 for the parasound;
http://parasound.com/zcustom/zphono.phpThanks for finding the Cambridge spec, of course it was not listed everywhere else I looked.
Yet funnier/sadder is that I sent a draft of the spec to both of them and did not hear a peep. I'll ask for the CA spec to be added and I'll ask Parasound to confirm which version of the truth they uphold. Not sure who Tony is, I had been dealing with Paul Brownlee there.
Arvind, I did not note in your review whether the subsonic filter in the Cambridge was switched in or out (nor does Cambridge seem to list the specs for that filter)
The filter was always off. Sorry, I should have been clearer about that. I always lean on the side of lesser circuitry where possible.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: