Vinyl Asylum

• so based on that - OMalley 19:37:39 09/17/06 (2)
  In Reply to: Re: according to Ed's DB both the 301 & 304 are compatable with a medium mass Rega RB250 arm. posted by krenzler on September 17, 2006 at 19:04:15:

  I should take the added weight off for the 103R?

  And adding weight for the 301, 304, and 160 would be needed? It did improve the 160.
  

  ~Slainte,
  The OMalley
  
  

  ---

  • Re: so based on that - krenzler 21:35:38 09/17/06 (1)
    In Reply to: so based on that posted by OMalley on September 17, 2006 at 19:37:39:

    No, theoretically the reverse. :-) More weight for the 103 and less for 301/304/160. Test it on the tools page.

    DL-160 compliance @ 10Hz = 18cu.

    But in the real world? Who knows? You did get an improvement with adding weight to the DL-160 (moving the system resonance further away from the "perfect" 10Hz) so there's no saying...
    
    

    • Tools - again.   (Open in New Window)

    
    

    ---

    • It's also about synergy - J Harris 07:27:45 09/18/06 (0)
      In Reply to: Re: so based on that posted by krenzler on September 17, 2006 at 21:35:38:

      You can tweak arm mass and so on, but arms that are meant for low-compliance cartridges will work better with them... the better arms also have better bearings, better anti-resonance design; in the modern ones, better cabling and so on. I'm just pointing out that the Denon is a high-end cartridge despite its price, and deserves the best it can get to show its full performance - rich yes, but even and clean through both frequency extremes.

      Patrick
      
      

      ---

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Crux Audio

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---