|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
71.29.109.1
In Reply to: Hi Fi Fetishism posted by Tancred on February 21, 2007 at 10:02:01:
Tancred,If you read down through all these messages there's a common thread here. We do it because we think it's fun and it's another hobby like model trains or owning a motorcycle.
But the bottom line is I think you're in the wrong forum for "audiophilia" and "audiophiles" in general. Here, most of us like to find and restore older equipment. Common threads are searching for bargains at thrift shops and garage sales and searching for data on restoration.
There is a much more practical approach to the hardware here. Very expensive cables and gadgets are in the minority. Most of us use $0.39/ft lamp cord for our speaker cables because we don't see the point of $20/ft magic cables. If you're restoring a 40 year old Fisher vacuum tube receiver yourself, you had better have a practical view of things, a working knowledge of electronics, and be handy with tools. That does not describe the typical "audiophile", nor do I personally want to be classified as such.
From my observations of "audiophiles" and those afflicted with "audiophilia nervosa" I see two basic conditions: insecurity and conspicuous consumption. These manifest themselves as a kind of "elitism". A "mine's bigger than yours is" kind of approach. A search for bragging rights. A belief that if it costs more it must be better. A belief which is callously exploited by the marketeers.
An example from another field comes to mind. My son used to run a Dodge Neon ACR in the Sports Car Club of America's Solo II slalom series. Although they were not in his class, he turned in better raw times than a Porsche Boxster. The Porsche owner was incensed and insisted he must be cheating (he wasn't)to beat his Porsche with a Neon. It simply was not in the realm of possibility to him that a Neon could beat him.
Similarly, it is not credible to an audiophile that my $1400 system, based on 35 year old speakers, could be better sounding than his $40,000 system. Yet, I can cite several examples and provide witnesses.
If you want the answers to your questions, you might find some hints here, but I really think you need to find a hotbed of real "audiophiles" and not the hangout for hobbyists you've addressed here.
Follow Ups:
is Al Gear. Well, that's not exactly his name, but close enough. You see, I met him long ago. Back when I worked at an audio store in my college days. He was always hip on ARC stuff, but I doubt he really knew why. He ended up buying three pair of Dahlquist DQ-10s from us. So, what did he do with three pair? Well, he kept selling, then re-purchasing the speakers one at a time! I think he went through at least one pair of MG-IIs from us as well. I vividly remember the day Julian, Sam and I accepted an invitation to Mr. Gear's house. He owned twenty records. Twenty records. Four Sheffields and a gangly collection of pop and classical.Sounds great, Al.
Back in the 70's I came across this guy who had a 2 bedroom apartment, with a pair of McIntosh ML-4's and 2 pair of the big JBL console speakers (about the same size as ML-4's). He had the local shop searching the world for 6 Mac MC350 (300 watt monaural tube amps, model #??) power amps and wouldn't pick them up until all 6 were there. He wanted similar systems in the living room and both bedrooms! Sounds like a lease breaker to me. They had 5 and were searching for #6 at that time. This guy put every spare cent he had into gear.
rw
He owned a "no shit", real $100k rig...And one milk crate of records and one 25 slot CD stand of discs.Every time I heard this rig I had to hear Amanda McGloom, Lincoln Mayboreya and Christopher Cross's "Sailing".
Unless I brought some platters to spin the trip was a waste of time!
--
Al G
Dave
Later Gator,
Crank up your talking machine, grab a jar of your favorite "kick-back", sit down, relax, and let the good times roll.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: