 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
69.132.141.143
With all this recent discussions about the effect and application of this choke I am curious as to the best and easiest way to try it in my system.I have a dedicated line feeding huge(23amp rated) balanced power transformer(in the crawl space) to P&S wall outlets in my listening room. I am also using an isolation transformer for isolation of my digital gear and a smaller one for my preamp
Thanks for your thoughts!
Julien
"There's someone in my head, but it's not me"
Follow Ups:
JulienI prefer the 193M with balanced a/c. I have two on a 220v line...excellent results. Use the 193L for unbalanced 120v.
Alan
Just to clarify again. Alan, I too have a balanced a/c (60v/60v). Would the best way to implement the chokes be: one 193M at the primary side of the trasformer and one 193M on each of the outlets coming out of the secondary. ( i have four outlets coming from the balanced secondary, so i need four 193M for the outlets). Or would the 193L (instead of the 193M) be enough for each of the balanced outlets?
Also, with the chokes on each of the balanced outlets, will there be still a need to isolate the outlet for digital (from outlets for amp and preamp) or the choke is enough to filter the noise from digital gears? Thanks again.
First of all when I think balanced a/c it's more in the line of 220/240v. In a typical 120v split phase application I would suggest adding a 193M to the primary, and a 193L to each outlet on the secondary. No other kinds of internal filtering is required, unless you are experimenting in magnetic coupling tweaks...I'm a big fan of this type of passive filtering.Alan
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
